Table 5. 2020 MG-3 Yield, Agronomic, and Quality Data across REC

Table 5-a. Mean yield and agronomic traits of 9 Maturity Group III (3.0 – 3.9) soybean varieties evaluated in small plot replicated trials at seven AgResearch and Education Center locations in Tennessee during 2020. Analysis included variety performance over a 1 yr (2020), 2 yr (2019-2020), and 3 yr (2018-2020) period.

† Hybrids that have any MS letter in common are not significantly different at the 5% level of probability.

* Hybrids marked with an asterisk were in the top performing “A” group for two (**) or three (***) years within the previous three year evaluation period.

‡ For a full description of abbreviated biotech traits, see table 31.

§ All yields are adjusted to 13% moisture.

‖ Lodging was evaluated on a a scale of 1 (no lodging) to 5 (complete lodging). C.V. is not reported for lodging since it was not measured using a ratio scale.

¶ Protein and oil on a dry weight basis. 

 

Table 5-b. Mean yield and quality of 9 Maturity Group III (3.0 – 3.9) soybean varieties evaluated in small plot replicated trials at seven AgResearch and Education Center locations in Tennessee during 2020. Analysis included variety performance over a 1 yr (2020), 2 yr (2019-2020), and 3 yr (2018-2020) period.

† Hybrids that have any MS letter in common are not significantly different at the 5% level of probability.

* Hybrids marked with an asterisk were in the top performing “A” group for two (**) or three (***) years within the previous three year evaluation period.

‡ For a full description of abbreviated biotech traits, see table 31.

§ All yields are adjusted to 13% moisture.

‖ Lodging was evaluated on a a scale of 1 (no lodging) to 5 (complete lodging). C.V. is not reported for lodging since it was not measured using a ratio scale.

¶ Protein and oil on a dry weight basis.