Table 5. 2020 MG-3 Yield, Agronomic, and Quality Data across REC

Table 5-a. Mean yield and agronomic traits of 9 Maturity Group III (3.0 – 3.9) soybean varieties evaluated in small plot replicated trials at seven AgResearch and Education Center locations in Tennessee during 2020. Analysis included variety performance over a 1 yr (2020), 2 yr (2019-2020), and 3 yr (2018-2020) period.

VarietyHerbicide Pkg† Avg. Yield§
(bu/ac)
     Moisture at Harvest
(%)
     Plant Height
(in.)
     Lodging?
(1-5)
     
1 yr2 yr3 yr1 yr2 yr3 yr1 yr2 yr3 yr1 yr2 yr3 yr
HybridHerbicide Pkg†Avg. Yield§
(bu/ac)
1 yr
MS
Avg. Yield§
1 yr
Avg. Yield§
(bu/ac)
2 yr
MS
Avg. Yield§
2 yr
Avg. Yield§
(bu/ac)
3 yr
MS
Avg. Yield§
3 yr
Moisture
(%)
1 yr
MS
Moisture
1 yr
Moisture
(%)
2 yr
MS
Moisture
2 yr
Moisture
(%)
3 yr
MS
Moisture
3 yr
Plant Height
(in.)
1 yr
MS
Plant Height
1 yr
Plant Height
(in.)
2 yr
MS
Plant Height
2 yr
Plant Height
(in.)
3 yr
MS
Plant Height
3 yr
Lodging¶
(%)
1 yr
MS
Lodging¶
1 yr
Lodging¶
(%)
2 yr
MS
Lodging¶
2 yr
Lodging¶
(%)
3 yr
MS
Lodging¶
3 yr
Credenz CZ 3930 GTLLRR, LLS2002359.3A13.8A38AB1.7BC
AgriGold G3722RXR2XS1901057.4AB58.0AB13.3B12.9A39A38A1.5CD1.5B
Local Seed Co. LS3976X**R2XS1905057.4AB60.3A12.8CD12.6AB37BC36B2.1A2.1A
Local Seed Co. LS3906GLGT, LLS2004557.4AB13.3B38AB1.9AB
Asgrow AG38X8R2XS1701756.9AB12.5D36C1.2D
Dyna-Gro S39EN19**E3S1907056.4AB58.5AB12.9CD12.6AB34D34C1.6BC1.6B
AgriGold G3620RXR2XS2008156.3AB12.7CD37AB1.6BC
Asgrow AG39X7R2XS1701855.3BC56.6B55.7A12.5D12.3B12.5A37AB37AB38A1.5C1.4B1.4A
Asgrow AG36X6R2XS1701552.3C53.9C53.9A13.0BC12.5B12.8A34D34C33B1.6BC1.5B1.5A
Average56.557.554.813.012.612.73736361.61.61.4
Standard Error5.43.84.20.60.60.43330.30.30.2
L.S.D..053.52.4N.S.0.40.4N.S.1110.30.3N.S.
C.V.10910565678
Plots per entry (reps x locs x years.)183654183645183645183645

† Hybrids that have any MS letter in common are not significantly different at the 5% level of probability.

* Hybrids marked with an asterisk were in the top performing “A” group for two (**) or three (***) years within the previous three year evaluation period.

‡ For a full description of abbreviated biotech traits, see table 31.

§ All yields are adjusted to 13% moisture.

‖ Lodging was evaluated on a a scale of 1 (no lodging) to 5 (complete lodging). C.V. is not reported for lodging since it was not measured using a ratio scale.

¶ Protein and oil on a dry weight basis. 

 

Table 5-b. Mean yield and quality of 9 Maturity Group III (3.0 – 3.9) soybean varieties evaluated in small plot replicated trials at seven AgResearch and Education Center locations in Tennessee during 2020. Analysis included variety performance over a 1 yr (2020), 2 yr (2019-2020), and 3 yr (2018-2020) period.

VarietyHerbicide Pkg† Avg. Yield§
(bu/ac)
     Maturity
(DAP)
     Protein¶
(%)
     Oil¶
(%)
     
1 yr2 yr3 yr1 yr2 yr3 yr1 yr2 yr3 yr1 yr2 yr3 yr
HybridHerbicide Pkg†Avg. Yield§
(bu/ac)
1 yr
MS
Avg. Yield§
1 yr
Avg. Yield§
(bu/ac)
2 yr
MS
Avg. Yield§
2 yr
Avg. Yield§
(bu/ac)
3 yr
MS
Avg. Yield§
3 yr
Maturity
(DAP)
1 yr
MS
Maturity
1 yr
Maturity
(DAP)
2 yr
MS
Maturity
2 yr
Maturity
(DAP)
3 yr
MS
Maturity
3 yr
Protein¶
(%)
1 yr
MS
Protein¶
1 yr
Protein¶
(%)
2 yr
MS
Protein¶
2 yr
Protein¶
(%)
3 yr
MS
Protein¶
3 yr
Oil¶
(%)
1 yr
MS
Oil¶
1 yr
Oil¶
(%)
2 yr
MS
Oil¶
2 yr
Oil¶
(%)
3 yr
MS
Oil¶
3 yr
Credenz CZ 3930 GTLLRR, LLS2002359.3A134A38.1D23.4A
AgriGold G3722RXR2XS1901057.4AB58.0AB130BC124A41.4A40.8A22.0EF22.4C
Local Seed Co. LS3976X**R2XS1905057.4AB60.3A128CD124AB39.9C38.5B23.6A24.1A
Local Seed Co. LS3906GLGT, LLS2004557.4AB130BC39.8C22.9B
Asgrow AG38X8R2XS1701756.9AB127DE40.7AB22.3DE
Dyna-Gro S39EN19**E3S1907056.4AB58.5AB130B125A39.9BC39.0B22.6BC23.1B
AgriGold G3620RXR2XS2008156.3AB125F39.8C22.3CD
Asgrow AG39X7R2XS1701855.3BC56.6B55.7A126EF122C121A40.4BC39.2B39.5A21.8F22.3C22.1B
Asgrow AG36X6R2XS1701552.3C53.9C53.9A127D-F123BC121A40.3BC39.0B39.6A22.6CD22.9B22.8A
Average56.557.554.812812312140.039.339.522.623.022.5
Standard Error5.43.84.24540.31.10.90.10.50.3
L.S.D..053.52.4N.S.21N.S.0.80.9N.S.0.30.40.2
C.V.10910321121111
Plots per entry (reps x locs x years.)183654183645369369

† Hybrids that have any MS letter in common are not significantly different at the 5% level of probability.

* Hybrids marked with an asterisk were in the top performing “A” group for two (**) or three (***) years within the previous three year evaluation period.

‡ For a full description of abbreviated biotech traits, see table 31.

§ All yields are adjusted to 13% moisture.

‖ Lodging was evaluated on a a scale of 1 (no lodging) to 5 (complete lodging). C.V. is not reported for lodging since it was not measured using a ratio scale.

¶ Protein and oil on a dry weight basis.

 

 

Virginia Sykes
Scroll to Top