Table A-5. Mean yields and agronomic data from Springfield, TN Irrigated, MG-3

Table A-5. Mean yield, agronomic traits, and quality of 9 Maturity Group III (3.0 – 3.9) soybean varieties evaluated in small plot replicated trials with irrigation at the Highland Rim AgResearch and Education Center in Springfield, Tennessee during 2020. Analysis included variety performance over a 1 yr (2020), 2 yr (2019-2020), and 3 yr (2018-2020) period.

Variety	Herbicide Pkg		Avg. Yield§ (bu/ac)						Moisture at Harvest (%)						Plant Height (in.)						Lodging? (1-5)						Maturity (DAP)
			1 yr		2 yr		3 yr		1 yr		2 yr		3 yr		1 yr		2 yr		3 yr		1 yr		2 yr		3 yr		1 yr		2 yr		3 yr
Variety	Herbicide Pkg		Avg. Yield§ (bu/ac) 1 yr	MS Avg. Yield§ 1 yr	Avg. Yield§ (bu/ac) 2 yr	MS Avg. Yield§ 2 yr	Avg. Yield§ (bu/ac) 3 yr	MS Avg. Yield§ 3 yr	Moisture (%) 1 yr	MS Moisture 1 yr	Moisture (%) 2 yr	MS Moisture 2 yr	Moisture (%) 3 yr	MS Moisture 3 yr	Plant Height (in.) 1 yr	MS Plant Height 1 yr	Plant Height (in.) 2 yr	MS Plant Height 2 yr	Plant Height (in.) 3 yr	MS Plant Height 3 yr	Lodging¶ (%) 1 yr	MS Lodging¶ 1 yr	Lodging¶ (%) 2 yr	MS Lodging¶ 2 yr	Lodging¶ (%) 3 yr	MS Lodging¶ 3 yr	Maturity (DAP) 1 yr	MS Maturity 1 yr	Maturity (DAP) 2 yr	MS Maturity 2 yr	Maturity (DAP) 3 yr	MS Maturity 3 yr
Dyna-Gro S39EN19**	E3	S19070	74.9	A	64.8	A			10.6	A	10.9	B			31	A	29	BC			1.0		1.0				140	A	132	AB
Local Seed Co. LS3976X**	R2X	S19050	74.0	A	64.8	A			10.7	A	11.0	B			33	A	31	AB			1.0		1.0				138	B	132	BC
Credenz CZ 3930 GTLL	RR, LL	S20023	73.0	A					10.7	A					35	A					1.0						139	AB
Local Seed Co. LS3906GL	GT, LL	S20045	70.8	A					10.7	A					33	A					1.0						140	A
AgriGold G3620RX	R2X	S20081	67.8	A					10.6	A					33	A					1.0						138	B
Asgrow AG38X8	R2X	S17017	67.6	A					10.7	A					31	A					1.0						138	B
Asgrow AG36X6	R2X	S17015	65.1	A	53.0	B	53.6	A	10.9	A	11.1	B	12.1	A	30	A	27	C	28	B	1.0		1.0		1.0		138	B	131	BC	128	A
AgriGold G3722RX	R2X	S19010	63.6	A	56.5	B			11.2	A	11.8	A			32	A	31	AB			1.0		1.0				140	A	133	A
Asgrow AG39X7	R2X	S17018	62.5	A	55.2	B	54.6	A	10.6	A	11.2	B	12.1	A	32	A	32	A	32	A	1.0		1.0		1.0		138	B	131	C	128	A
Average			68.8		58.9		54.1		10.7		11.2		12.1		32		30		30		1.0		1.0		1.0		139		132		128
Standard Error			4.1		9.3		5.7		0.1		0.4		1.0		1		1		1		.		.		.		1		7		5
L.S.D..05			N.S.		6		N.S.		0.3		0.4		N.S.		N.S.		2		2		.		.		.		2		1		N.S.
C.V.			7		9		7		2		3		4		6		6		6		.		.		.		1		1		1

† Hybrids that have any MS letter in common are not significantly different at the 5% level of probability. * Hybrids marked with an asterisk were in the top performing “A” group for two (**) or three (***) years within the previous three year evaluation period. ‡ For a full description of abbreviated biotech traits, see table 31. § All yields are adjusted to 13% moisture. ‖ Lodging was evaluated on a a scale of 1 (no lodging) to 5 (complete lodging). C.V. is not reported for lodging since it was not measured using a ratio scale. ¶ Protein and oil on a dry weight basis. Values highlighted in light orange are above average for a given trait, MS letters highlighted in dark orange are in the “A group”, indicating no statistical difference from the top-performing variety, for a given trait.