Table A-31. Mean yields and agronomic data from Spring Hill, TN, MG-5

Table A-31. Mean† yield, agronomic traits, and quality of 18 Maturity Group V Early (5.0 – 5.4) soybean varieties evaluated in small plot replicated trials without irrigation at the Middle Tennessee AgResearch and Education Center in Spring Hill, Tennessee during 2021. Analysis included variety performance over a 1 yr (2021), 2 yr (2020-2021), and 3 yr (2019-2021) period.

VarietyHerbicide Pkg†Avg. Yield§
Moisture at Harvest
Plant Height
1 yr2 yr1 yr2 yr1 yr2 yr1 yr2 yr1 yr2 yr1 yr
USG 7562XFXF65A11.9G28F1.0C154B1.7A
Asgrow AG54XF0XF, STS63AB12.9D-F32A-C1.0C160A1.0A
AR R15-1587Conv.61A-C13.1DE29D-F1.2C152BC1.7A
Local Seed Co. LS5009XS*R2X, STS60A-D64A13.0DE13.6B34A42A1.0C2.3A154B149A2.3A
AR R13-13997Conv.60A-D12.8D-F30C-F1.2C151BC1.0A
Progeny P5252RXR2X57A-E55A13.9AB14.2A31A-F39B1.0C2.2A151C148A1.0A
Credenz CZ 5282XFXF56B-F13.2CD34AB1.0C152BC1.0A
AgriGold G5000RXR2X, STS55B-F13.0DE28EF1.0C151BC1.0A
Local Seed Co. LS5119XFXF55B-F13.1DE32A-C1.0C151BC1.0A
Dyna-Gro S52XT91R2X54B-F13.2D31B-F1.0C150C1.0A
Progeny P5121E3E352C-G13.8A-C29D-F1.0C153BC2.7A
Progeny P5003XFXF52D-G13.0DE30C-F1.0C151BC2.0A
AgriGold G5288RXR2X, STS50D-H13.0DE32A-C1.0C152BC1.0A
Asgrow AG52XF0XF, STS49E-H12.6EF32A-E1.0C151BC3.0A
Progeny P5016RXS*R2X, STS49E-H61A13.2D13.7AB32A-D40B1.0C1.3B152BC149A1.3A
AR UA54i19GTRR46F-H53A13.4B-D13.6B32A-E41AB1.0C1.2B150C148A1.0A
MO S16-14801CConv.42GH14.0A31B-F2.7A151BC1.0A
MO S16-9478CConv.41H12.4FG30C-F2.0B154B1.0A
Standard Error460.20.4280.10.8130.7

† Varieties that have any MS letter in common are not significantly different at the 5% level of probability. Values highlighted in light orange are above average for a given trait, MS letters highlighted in dark orange are in the “A group”, indicating no statistical difference from the top-performing variety, for a given trait.

* Asterisks after a name indicate the number of preceding consecutive years in the top-performing “A” group.

‡ For a full description of abbreviated biotech traits, see table 31.

§ All yields are adjusted to 13% moisture. 

‖ Lodging was evaluated on a a scale of 1 (no lodging) to 5 (complete lodging).

‡‡ Frogeye was evaluated using a 1 to 9 scale, with 1 indicating no disease. Evaluated in mid-September.

Scroll to Top