Table A-25. Mean yields and agronomic data from Jackson, TN, MG-3

Table A-25. Mean yield, agronomic traits, and quality of 9 Maturity Group III (3.0 – 3.9) soybean varieties evaluated in small plot replicated trials without irrigation at the West Tennessee AgResearch and Education Center in Jackson, Tennessee during 2020. Analysis included variety performance over a 1 yr (2020), 2 yr (2019-2020), and 3 yr (2018-2020) period.
VarietyHerbicide Pkg† Avg. Yield§
(bu/ac)
     Moisture at Harvest
(%)
     Plant Height
(in.)
     Lodging?
(1-5)
     Maturity
(DAP)
     
1 yr2 yr3 yr1 yr2 yr3 yr1 yr2 yr3 yr1 yr2 yr3 yr1 yr2 yr3 yr
VarietyHerbicide Pkg†Avg. Yield§
(bu/ac)
1 yr
MS
Avg. Yield§
1 yr
Avg. Yield§
(bu/ac)
2 yr
MS
Avg. Yield§
2 yr
Avg. Yield§
(bu/ac)
3 yr
MS
Avg. Yield§
3 yr
Moisture
(%)
1 yr
MS
Moisture
1 yr
Moisture
(%)
2 yr
MS
Moisture
2 yr
Moisture
(%)
3 yr
MS
Moisture
3 yr
Plant Height
(in.)
1 yr
MS
Plant Height
1 yr
Plant Height
(in.)
2 yr
MS
Plant Height
2 yr
Plant Height
(in.)
3 yr
MS
Plant Height
3 yr
Lodging¶
(%)
1 yr
MS
Lodging¶
1 yr
Lodging¶
(%)
2 yr
MS
Lodging¶
2 yr
Lodging¶
(%)
3 yr
MS
Lodging¶
3 yr
Maturity
(DAP)
1 yr
MS
Maturity
1 yr
Maturity
(DAP)
2 yr
MS
Maturity
2 yr
Maturity
(DAP)
3 yr
MS
Maturity
3 yr
Credenz CZ 3930 GTLLRR, LLS2002360.2A14.9A42A1.7A126A
Local Seed Co. LS3976X**R2XS1905056.4AB54.1A12.2CD13.8B41AB38A1.3A2.0A117B-D112A
Local Seed Co. LS3906GLGT, LLS2004555.9A-C13.0BC41A1.7A117B-D
Dyna-Gro S39EN19**E3S1907053.8A-D53.3A13.2B14.1AB33C34B1.7A1.3A120BC110A
Asgrow AG39X7R2XS1701852.4B-D50.6AB53.2A11.3EF13.0B12.7A40AB39A39A1.7A1.3A1.4A116CD111A108A
Asgrow AG38X8R2XS1701751.2B-D10.9F38B1.0A120BC
AgriGold G3722RXR2XS1901049.5C-E51.5AB15.4A15.1A40AB40A1.0A1.7A121B113A
Asgrow AG36X6R2XS1701548.0DE49.0B55.0A12.2C-E13.3B12.9A37B38A37B1.0A1.0A1.0A118B-D110A107A
AgriGold G3620RXR2XS2008144.0E11.8D-F41A1.0A115D
Average52.451.754.112.813.812.83938381.31.51.2119111108
Standard Error2.61.34.50.31.10.91110.40.30.2175
L.S.D..056.8N.S.N.S.0.91.2N.S.333N.S.N.S.N.S.4N.S.N.S.
C.V.769473567222
† Hybrids that have any MS letter in common are not significantly different at the 5% level of probability. * Hybrids marked with an asterisk were in the top performing “A” group for two (**) or three (***) years within the previous three year evaluation period. ‡ For a full description of abbreviated biotech traits, see table 31. § All yields are adjusted to 13% moisture. ‖ Lodging was evaluated on a a scale of 1 (no lodging) to 5 (complete lodging). C.V. is not reported for lodging since it was not measured using a ratio scale. ¶ Protein and oil on a dry weight basis. Values highlighted in light orange are above average for a given trait, MS letters highlighted in dark orange are in the “A group”, indicating no statistical difference from the top-performing variety, for a given trait.    
Virginia Sykes
Scroll to Top