Table 63. Mean yields and agronomic characteristics of 11 Maturity Group V Conventional soybean varieties evaluated in five REC tests in Tennessee for two years, 2015 – 2016 (n=10).

Variety†Avg. Yield‡ ± Std Err. (n=10) bu/aMoisture § (n=10) %Lodging (n=9) ScoreHeight (n=10) in.Maturity (n=10) DAPLeaf Holding (n=1) ScoreProtein (n=2) %Oil (n=2) %SDS DI (n=1) %SDS DS (n=1) 0 - 9SDS DX (n=1) index
AR UA 5014C62 ± 113.21.2341341.239.422.31.70.70.4
GoSoy 56C1661 ± 112.82.2381411.340.022.110.01.34.4
AR R09-43060 ± 112.61.5331351.040.222.91.00.30.1
AR UA 5814HP60 ± 115.22.1401451.544.420.66.70.71.5
GoSoy Leland60 ± 112.62.4361361.039.322.40.00.00.0
AR UA 561260 ± 112.62.2381401.040.121.616.71.79.3
USDA-TN JTN-511059 ± 112.51.9361371.540.721.90.00.00.0
AR Osage58 ± 112.21.4321371.342.921.130.02.726.7
MO S11-1702558 ± 112.72.5341381.040.122.30.00.00.0
AR UA 5213C58 ± 112.62.1351371.041.920.535.03.327.8
TN Exp TN12-501456 ± 112.31.1291382.342.720.83.30.70.7
Average5912.81.9351381.341.121.79.51.06.4

 

† If a trait appears inside parentheses i.e. (RR), then it is not part of the variety name.

‡ All yields are adjusted to 13% moisture.

  • Average moisture at harvest.

Lodging = 1 to 5 scale; where 1 = 95% of plants erect; 2.5 = ~50% of plants leaning at angle ≥ 45°; 5 = 95+% of plants leaning at an angle ≥ 45°.

Maturity = days after planting (DAP).

Leaf Holding = 1 to 5 scale; where 1 = no leaves remaining on stems at maturity; 5 = 90+% of leaves remaining on stems at maturity.

Seed Quality = 1 to 5 scale; where 1 = < 5% of seeds showing disease or split seed coats; 5=95+% of seed are diseased or have split seed coats.

Protein & Oil on dry weight basis.

SDS disease ratings were taken at the Highland Rim Experiment Station on 9/3/2015

DI = disease incidence = percentage of plants with symptoms

DS = disease severity = score of leaf chlorosis and necrosis; 0 = no symptoms; 9 = plant death before normal defoliation due to senescence.

DX = disease index = (DI x DS / 9)

Scroll to Top