2019 MG-3 Yield, Agronomic, and Quality Data across REC Locations (1yr, 2yr, 3yr)

Table 5-a. Mean yield, agronomic traits, and quality of 13 Maturity Group III (3.0 – 3.9) soybean varieties evaluated in small plot replicated trials at six REC locations in Tennessee during 2019. Analysis included variety performance over a 1 yr (2019), 2 yr (2018-2019), and 3 yr (2017-2019) period.

HybridHerbicide Pkg†Avg. Yield§
(bu/ac)
1 yr
MS
Avg. Yield§
1 yr
Avg. Yield§
(bu/ac)
2 yr
MS
Avg. Yield§
2 yr
Avg. Yield§
(bu/ac)
3 yr
MS
Avg. Yield§
3 yr
Moisture
(%)
1 yr
MS
Moisture
1 yr
Moisture
(%)
2 yr
MS
Moisture
2 yr
Moisture
(%)
3 yr
MS
Moisture
3 yr
Plant Height
(in.)
1 yr
MS
Plant Height
1 yr
Plant Height
(in.)
2 yr
MS
Plant Height
2 yr
Plant Height
(in.)
3 yr
MS
Plant Height
3 yr
Lodging¶
(%)
1 yr
MS
Lodging¶
1 yr
Lodging¶
(%)
2 yr
MS
Lodging¶
2 yr
Lodging¶
(%)
3 yr
MS
Lodging¶
3 yr
Local Seed Co. LS3976XR2X64A12.4B36B-E2.1AB
Dyna-Gro S39EN19Enlist E362AB12.3B34E-G1.6CDE
Asgrow AG39X7R2X60BC57B59A12.0B12.5A12.3B38A38A38A1.2E1.3C1-4B
Asgrow AG37X9R2X60BC59A12.0B12.6A36A-D37A1.4DE1.5BC
AgriGold G3722RXR2X,STS60BC12.3B38AB1.4DE
NK Seeds S39-G2XR2X60BC13.6A36B-E1.7BCD
Dyna-Gro S37EN39Enlist E360B11.9B33G1.4DE
Credenz CZ 3841 LLLL57CD56BC57AB12.2B12.9A12.8A37A-C37A37A2.2A2.1A2-1A
Credenz 3929 GTLLGT,LL57CD13.6A38A1.9ABC
Asgrow AG36X6R2X56DE55BC55BC12.2B12.8A12.5AB34FG33C33C1.4DE1.4C1-5B
Caverndale Farms CF 387 HT-GLYnRR55D-F54C53C12.4B12.9A12.7A36C-E35B35B1.6CDE1.8AB1-9A
Credenz CZ 3660 GTLLGT,LL54EF10.2C35D-F1.7BCD
Warren Seed BG 3701 RR2XR2X52F10.3C37A-D1.5CDE
Average58565612.112.812.63636361.61.61.7
Standard Error4430.60.60.53330.30.20.3
L.S.D..053320.9N.S.0.32110.40.30.3
C.V.810111266877
Plots per entry (reps x locs x years.)183654183645183645183645

† Hybrids that have any MS letter in common are not significantly different at the 5% level of probability.

* Hybrids marked with an asterisk were in the top performing “A” group for two (**) or three (***) years within the previous three year evaluation period.

‡ For a full description of abbreviated biotech traits, see table 31.

§ All yields are adjusted to 13% moisture.

‖ Lodging was evaluated on a a scale of 1 (no lodging) to 5 (complete lodging). C.V. is not reported for lodging since it was not measured using a ratio scale.

¶ Protein and oil on a dry weight basis.

Table 5-b. Mean yield, agronomic traits, and quality of 11 Maturity Group III (3.0 – 3.9) soybean varieties evaluated in small plot replicated trials at six REC locations in Tennessee during 2019. Analysis included variety performance over a 1 yr (2019), 2 yr (2018-2019), and 3 yr (2017-2019) period.

HybridHerbicide Pkg†Avg. Yield§
(bu/ac)
1 yr
MS
Avg. Yield§
1 yr
Avg. Yield§
(bu/ac)
2 yr
MS
Avg. Yield§
2 yr
Avg. Yield§
(bu/ac)
3 yr
MS
Avg. Yield§
3 yr
Maturity
(DAP)
1 yr
MS
Maturity
1 yr
Maturity
(DAP)
2 yr
MS
Maturity
2 yr
Maturity
(DAP)
3 yr
MS
Maturity
3 yr
Protein¶
(%)
1 yr
MS
Protein¶
1 yr
Protein¶
(%)
2 yr
MS
Protein¶
2 yr
Protein¶
(%)
3 yr
MS
Protein¶
3 yr
Oil¶
(%)
1 yr
MS
Oil¶
1 yr
Oil¶
(%)
2 yr
MS
Oil¶
2 yr
Oil¶
(%)
3 yr
MS
Oil¶
3 yr
Local Seed Co. LS3976XR2X64A121BC37.0CD24.6A
Dyna-Gro S39EN19Enlist E362AB120C-E38.0BC23.6B
Asgrow AG39X7R2X60BC57B59A120C-E119BC120B38.0B-D39.0A39.0A22.7E22.3C22.0C
Asgrow AG37X9R2X60BC59A119E119AB38.0B-D39.2A22.8DE22.3C
AgriGold G3722RXR2X,STS60BC121B-D40.3A22.9C-E
NK Seeds S39-G2XR2X60BC121AB38.2B23.4BC
Dyna-Gro S37EN39Enlist E360B119DE36.9D24.4A
Credenz CZ 3841 LLLL57CD56BC57AB120C-E120A121A38.1BC39.6A39.5A23.6B23.3B23.0B
Credenz 3929 GTLLGT,LL57CD122A37.8B-D24.2A
Asgrow AG36X6R2X56DE55BC55BC119DE119AB120BC37.7B-D39.2A39.2A23.3B-D23.0B22.8B
Caverndale Farms CF 387 HT-GLYnRR55D-F54C53C117F118C119C37.8B-D39.3A39.0A24.4A23.8A23.5A
Credenz CZ 3660 GTLLGT,LL54EF118F38.7B23.6B
Warren Seed BG 3701 RR2XR2X52F118F38.1BC23.4BC
Average58565612011912038.039.339.223.622.922.8
Standard Error4434430.41.40.80.20.40.4
L.S.D..053321111.1N.S.N.S.0.60.30.3
C.V.81011111211111
Plots per entry (reps x locs x years.)183654183645369369

† Hybrids that have any MS letter in common are not significantly different at the 5% level of probability.

* Hybrids marked with an asterisk were in the top performing “A” group for two (**) or three (***) years within the previous three year evaluation period.

‡ For a full description of abbreviated biotech traits, see table 31.

§ All yields are adjusted to 13% moisture.

‖ Lodging was evaluated on a a scale of 1 (no lodging) to 5 (complete lodging). C.V. is not reported for lodging since it was not measured using a ratio scale.

¶ Protein and oil on a dry weight basis.

Virginia Sykes

Questions about table data?
Virginia Sykes vsykes@utk.edu
Feedback or issues with site information?
Angela McClure athomp15@utk.edu
Virginia Sykes

Latest posts by Virginia Sykes (see all)

Scroll to Top