Table 41. Three year across locations mean yields and agronomic characteristics of 4 Maturity Group V Late (5.6-5.9) soybean varieties evaluated in five REC tests in Tennessee during 2015-2017.

MS†
Avg.
Yield
Variety*Trait Package‡ Avg. Yield§
(bu/ac)
Avg. Yield Std Err.Moisture
(%)
Lodging‖
(1-5)
Plant Height
(in.)
Maturity¶
(DAP)
Protein††
(%)
Oil††
(%)
Average605132371424221
AAR UA 5814HPCONV61514.12.64014543.920.8
AUSG 75B75RRR260512.11.83814341.221.5
AProgeny 5752RYRR260512.11.63814240.621.7
AAR OsageCONV58512.61.83213843.020.9
† Varieties that have any MS letter in common are not significantly different in yield at the 5% level of probability.* Varieties marked with an asterisk were in the top performing “A” group for two (**) or three (***) consecutive years within the previous three year evaluation period.‡  For a full description of abbreviated biotech traits, see table 26.All yields are adjusted to 13% moisture.‖  Lodging = 1 to 5 scale; where 1 = 95% of plants erect; 2.5 = ~50% of plants leaning at angle ≥ 45°; 5 = 95+% of plants leaning at an angle ≥ 45°.¶ Maturity = days after planting (DAP).††Protein & Oil on dry weight basis.