Table 41. Three year across locations mean yields and agronomic characteristics of 4 Maturity Group V Late (5.6-5.9) soybean varieties evaluated in five REC tests in Tennessee during 2015-2017.

MS† Avg. Yield	Variety*	Trait Package‡	Avg. Yield§ (bu/ac)	Avg. Yield Std Err.	Moisture (%)	Lodging‖ (1-5)	Plant Height (in.)	Maturity¶ (DAP)	Protein†† (%)	Oil†† (%)
	Average		60	5	13	2	37	142	42	21
A	AR UA 5814HP	CONV	61	5	14.1	2.6	40	145	43.9	20.8
A	USG 75B75R	RR2	60	5	12.1	1.8	38	143	41.2	21.5
A	Progeny 5752RY	RR2	60	5	12.1	1.6	38	142	40.6	21.7
A	AR Osage	CONV	58	5	12.6	1.8	32	138	43.0	20.9

† Varieties that have any MS letter in common are not significantly different in yield at the 5% level of probability.* Varieties marked with an asterisk were in the top performing “A” group for two (**) or three (***) consecutive years within the previous three year evaluation period.‡  For a full description of abbreviated biotech traits, see table 26.All yields are adjusted to 13% moisture.‖  Lodging = 1 to 5 scale; where 1 = 95% of plants erect; 2.5 = ~50% of plants leaning at angle ≥ 45°; 5 = 95+% of plants leaning at an angle ≥ 45°.¶ Maturity = days after planting (DAP).††Protein & Oil on dry weight basis.