Table 37. Across locations mean yields and agronomic characteristics of 13 Maturity Group V Late (5.6-5.9) soybean varieties evaluated in six REC tests in Tennessee during 2017.

MS† Avg. Yield	Variety*	Trait Package‡	Avg. Yield§ (bu/ac)	Avg. Yield Std Err.	Moisture (%)	Lodging‖ (1-5)	Plant Height (in.)	Maturity¶ (DAP)	Protein†† (%)	Oil†† (%)
A	Progeny 5688RX	R2X	67	3	13	2.5	38	144	38.8	21.3
AB	TN Exp TN12-5712R2	RR2	66	3	13.0	2.0	38	146	40.3	21.2
AB	USG 7568XT	R2X	66	3	13.0	2.4	38	145	39.4	21.1
AB	TN Exp TN11-5140	CONV	65	3	13.5	2.5	40	146	40.3	21.9
ABC	USG 75B75R	RR2	62	3	12.7	1.9	39	145	41.2	21.1
BCD	Progeny 5752RY	RR2	61	3	12.7	1.8	38	145	41.4	21.2
CDE	USG Allen	RR	59	3	13.0	1.9	39	146	41.1	21.0
CDE	Progeny 5623LL	LL	59	3	12.7	3.3	36	143	39.2	21.9
CDE	AR UA 5715GT	RR	59	3	13.0	2.0	38	147	39.2	21.8
CDE	AR UA 5814HP	CONV	57	3	13.5	2.9	39	147	42.9	21.0
DE	AR Osage	CONV	56	3	13.3	2.3	33	140	43.1	20.3
DE	AR R11-8346	CONV	55	3	13.1	2.0	35	143	42.9	20.8
E	AR R11-7999	CONV	55	3	13.4	2.5	35	146	42.8	20.3
	Average		61	3	13.1	2	37	145	41.0	21.1

  † Varieties that have any MS letter in common are not significantly different in yield at the 5% level of probability. * Varieties marked with an asterisk were in the top performing “A” group for two (**) or three (***) consecutive years within the previous three year evaluation period. ‡  For a full description of abbreviated biotech traits, see table 26. All yields are adjusted to 13% moisture. ‖  Lodging = 1 to 5 scale; where 1 = 95% of plants erect; 2.5 = ~50% of plants leaning at angle ≥ 45°; 5 = 95+% of plants leaning at an angle ≥ 45°. ¶ Maturity = days after planting (DAP). ††Protein & Oil on dry weight basis.