Table 37. Across locations mean yields and agronomic characteristics of 13 Maturity Group V Late (5.6-5.9) soybean varieties evaluated in six REC tests in Tennessee during 2017.

Variety*Trait Package‡ Avg. Yield§
Avg. Yield Std Err.Moisture
Plant Height
AProgeny 5688RXR2X673132.53814438.821.3
ABTN Exp TN12-5712R2RR266313.02.03814640.321.2
ABUSG 7568XTR2X66313.02.43814539.421.1
ABTN Exp TN11-5140CONV65313.52.54014640.321.9
ABCUSG 75B75RRR262312.71.93914541.221.1
BCDProgeny 5752RYRR261312.71.83814541.421.2
CDEUSG AllenRR59313.01.93914641.121.0
CDEProgeny 5623LLLL59312.73.33614339.221.9
CDEAR UA 5715GTRR59313.02.03814739.221.8
CDEAR UA 5814HPCONV57313.52.93914742.921.0
DEAR OsageCONV56313.32.33314043.120.3
DEAR R11-8346CONV55313.12.03514342.920.8
EAR R11-7999CONV55313.42.53514642.820.3
  † Varieties that have any MS letter in common are not significantly different in yield at the 5% level of probability. * Varieties marked with an asterisk were in the top performing “A” group for two (**) or three (***) consecutive years within the previous three year evaluation period. ‡  For a full description of abbreviated biotech traits, see table 26. All yields are adjusted to 13% moisture. ‖  Lodging = 1 to 5 scale; where 1 = 95% of plants erect; 2.5 = ~50% of plants leaning at angle ≥ 45°; 5 = 95+% of plants leaning at an angle ≥ 45°. ¶ Maturity = days after planting (DAP). ††Protein & Oil on dry weight basis.  

Virginia Sykes

Questions about table data?
Virginia Sykes
Feedback or issues with site information?
Angela McClure
Virginia Sykes

Latest posts by Virginia Sykes (see all)