Table 36. Three year across and by location mean yields of 12 Maturity Group V Early (5.0-5.5) soybean varieties evaluated in five REC tests in Tennessee during 2015-2017.

MS†
Avg.
Yield
Variety*Trait Package‡ Avg. Yield§
(bu/ac)
Avg. Yield Std Err.Knoxville
Irr.
(bu/ac)
Springfield
Irr.
(bu/ac)
Springfield
Non-Irr.
(bu/ac)
Milan
Irr.
(bu/ac)
Milan
Non-Irr.
(bu/ac)
Average5945959486663
ACredenz CZ 5147 LLLL6346562467469
AAR UA 5014CCONV6145758537363
AUSDA JTN-5110CONV6046254586465
AGoSoy LelandCONV6045862535869
ACredenz CZ 5242 LLLL6046162447163
AAR R09-430CONV6046056566859
ACredenz CZ 5150 LLLL6045864476762
ADyna-Gro S52LL66LL5945860476762
ATN Exp TN13-4303CONV5845854516859
AProgeny 5414LLSLL,STS5745466445766
ATerral REV 52A94RR,STS5746159396461
AAR UA 5414RRRR5145553346054
  † Varieties that have any MS letter in common are not significantly different in yield at the 5% level of probability. * Varieties marked with an asterisk were in the top performing “A” group for two (**) or three (***) consecutive years within the previous three year evaluation period. ‡  For a full description of abbreviated biotech traits, see table 26. All yields are adjusted to 13% moisture.  

Virginia Sykes

Questions about table data?
Virginia Sykes vsykes@utk.edu
Feedback or issues with site information?
Angela McClure athomp15@utk.edu
Virginia Sykes

Latest posts by Virginia Sykes (see all)