Table 24. 2020 MG-5E Yield, Agronomic, and Quality Data across REC

Table 24-a. Mean yield, agronomic traits, and quality of 23 Maturity Group V (5.0 – 5.9) soybean varieties evaluated in small plot replicated trials at eight REC locations in Tennessee during 2020 Analysis included variety performance over a 1 yr (2020), 2 yr (2019-2020), and 3 yr (2018-2020) period.

VarietyHerbicide Pkg† Avg. Yield§
(bu/ac)
     Moisture at Harvest
(%)
     Plant Height
(in.)
     Lodging?
(1-5)
     
1 yr2 yr3 yr1 yr2 yr3 yr1 yr2 yr3 yr1 yr2 yr3 yr
HybridHerbicide Pkg†Avg. Yield§
(bu/ac)
1 yr
MS
Avg. Yield§
1 yr
Avg. Yield§
(bu/ac)
2 yr
MS
Avg. Yield§
2 yr
Avg. Yield§
(bu/ac)
3 yr
MS
Avg. Yield§
3 yr
Moisture
(%)
1 yr
MS
Moisture
1 yr
Moisture
(%)
2 yr
MS
Moisture
2 yr
Moisture
(%)
3 yr
MS
Moisture
3 yr
Plant Height
(in.)
1 yr
MS
Plant Height
1 yr
Plant Height
(in.)
2 yr
MS
Plant Height
2 yr
Plant Height
(in.)
3 yr
MS
Plant Height
3 yr
Lodging¶
(%)
1 yr
MS
Lodging¶
1 yr
Lodging¶
(%)
2 yr
MS
Lodging¶
2 yr
Lodging¶
(%)
3 yr
MS
Lodging¶
3 yr
Asgrow AG53X0**R2XS1904365.2A61.8A13.8C-F12.9BC45B44A2D-G2B-E
Croplan CP5010XSR2XS2006563.6A13.6F-H43B-D2D-H
Asgrow AG52X9***R2XS1807863.4AB60.3AB61.6AB13.8C-F13.0BC13.3A43C-E42B44A1HI1G1C
Asgrow AG53X9***R2XS1807961.9A-C60.8AB62.7A14.1AB13.2AB13.5A38I39D40B1E-H2C-F2BC
Local Seed Co. LS5009XSR2X, STSS2004961.8A-D13.8B-E43BC2AB
Progeny P5016RXS**R2X, STSS1601860.6A-D57.0CD59.2BC14.0A-C13.0BC13.4A42C-E42B43A2D-H2D-G2B
VA V15-2261STConv.S1903858.7B-E56.0CD13.6E-G12.9CD36J36E1HI1FG
Local Seed Co. LS5087XR2XS1804258.3C-F57.9BC57.9C14.0A-C13.0BC13.2A41D-F42BC43A2B-E2A-D2A
Local Seed Co. ZS5098E3E3S2005057.7C-G13.9B-E48A2C-E
Credenz CZ 5299 XR2XS1904957.3C-G52.9EF13.6E-H12.6E43C-E42B2B-D2A
Progeny P5170RXR2XS1900557.0D-H56.9CD13.4GH12.6DE44BC44A2D-F2AB
MO S16-11651CConv.S2003556.9D-H13.5GH39HI2A
Progeny P5252RXR2XS1811255.6E-I51.5F50.2D13.8C-F12.9CD13.3A40F-H40CD41B2B-D2A2A
Local Seed Co. LS5386XR2XS1906055.5E-I57.1CD13.8C-F13.0BC41E-G42B2D-F1E-G
TN Exp TN18-5025Conv.S2002055.2E-I13.8C-F29M1HI
TN Exp TN16-5024Conv.S2002154.4E-I13.8B-E32L1D-H
TN Exp TN17-5021Conv.S2001854.4E-I13.9B-D28M1I
MO S16-3747RYRRS1902854.3E-I54.5DE14.2A13.3A38I37E2A-C2A-C
Credenz CZ 5000 XR2XS2003254.0E-I13.6F-H39G-I2A-C
AR R13-14635RRRRS2000653.8F-I13.5GH42C-E1G-I
Progeny P5211E3E3S2007653.3G-I13.7D-G38I2AB
TN Exp TN18-4130Conv.S2001952.4HI13.3H28M1E-H
TN Exp TN16-5027Conv.S2002252.1I13.4GH34K1F-I
Average57.357.058.313.713.013.33941421.61.61.7
Standard Error3.74.33.90.70.90.73330.20.30.3
L.S.D..054.83.02.90.30.3N.S.2110.30.30.2
C.V.151214456776
Plots per entry (reps x locs.)214263214263183654183654

† Hybrids that have any MS letter in common are not significantly different at the 5% level of probability.

* Hybrids marked with an asterisk were in the top performing “A” group for two (**) or three (***) years within the previous three year evaluation period.

‡ For a full description of abbreviated biotech traits, see table 31.

§ All yields are adjusted to 13% moisture.

‖ Lodging was evaluated on a a scale of 1 (no lodging) to 5 (complete lodging). C.V. is not reported for lodging since it was not measured using a ratio scale.

¶ Protein and oil on a dry weight basis.

Table 24-b. Mean yield, agronomic traits, and quality of 23 Maturity Group V (5.0 – 5.9) soybean varieties evaluated in small plot replicated trials at eight REC locations in Tennessee during 2020 Analysis included variety performance over a 1 yr (2020), 2 yr (2019-2020), and 3 yr (2018-2020) period.

VarietyHerbicide Pkg† Avg. Yield§
(bu/ac)
     Maturity
(DAP)
     Protein¶
(%)
     Oil¶
(%)
     
1 yr2 yr3 yr1 yr2 yr3 yr1 yr2 yr3 yr1 yr2 yr3 yr
HybridHerbicide Pkg†Avg. Yield§
(bu/ac)
1 yr
MS
Avg. Yield§
1 yr
Avg. Yield§
(bu/ac)
2 yr
MS
Avg. Yield§
2 yr
Avg. Yield§
(bu/ac)
3 yr
MS
Avg. Yield§
3 yr
Maturity
(DAP)
1 yr
MS
Maturity
1 yr
Maturity
(DAP)
2 yr
MS
Maturity
2 yr
Maturity
(DAP)
3 yr
MS
Maturity
3 yr
Protein¶
(%)
1 yr
MS
Protein¶
1 yr
Protein¶
(%)
2 yr
MS
Protein¶
2 yr
Protein¶
(%)
3 yr
MS
Protein¶
3 yr
Oil¶
(%)
1 yr
MS
Oil¶
1 yr
Oil¶
(%)
2 yr
MS
Oil¶
2 yr
Oil¶
(%)
3 yr
MS
Oil¶
3 yr
Asgrow AG53X0**R2XS1904365.2A61.8A146A-D140C39.5G-J39.2CD21.3KL21.7F
Croplan CP5010XSR2XS2006563.6A144D-G39.1I-L22.8AB
Asgrow AG52X9***R2XS1807863.4AB60.3AB61.6AB145C-G139DE139C39.5G-J38.9DE39.2C22.7BC23.2A23.0A
Asgrow AG53X9***R2XS1807961.9A-C60.8AB62.7A146A141AB141A40.4D-F39.8BC40.4B21.3KL21.7F21.6D
Local Seed Co. LS5009XSR2X, STSS2004961.8A-D145B-F41.2BC21.5JK
Progeny P5016RXS**R2X, STSS1601860.6A-D57.0CD59.2BC145C-G139CD140B39.7G-I38.9DE39.4C22.3DE22.5CD22.3BC
VA V15-2261STConv.S1903858.7B-E56.0CD145C-G140BC41.5AB40.7A21.7H-J22.2DE
Local Seed Co. LS5087XR2XS1804258.3C-F57.9BC57.9C144FG138E139C38.7KL38.4EF39.0C22.2D-F22.7BC22.5B
Local Seed Co. ZS5098E3E3S2005057.7C-G144GH40.5D-F22.9AB
Credenz CZ 5299 XR2XS1904957.3C-G52.9EF144E-G139DE39.8F-I39.9B21.6IJ21.7F
Progeny P5170RXR2XS1900557.0D-H56.9CD145B-F139DE38.5L38.3EF22.4CD22.8B
MO S16-11651CConv.S2003556.9D-H145B-F40.8B-D21.0M
Progeny P5252RXR2XS1811255.6E-I51.5F50.2D145C-G140BC141AB40.7C-E40.7A41.1A21.9F-H22.2E22.1C
Local Seed Co. LS5386XR2XS1906055.5E-I57.1CD146A-C141A37.2M37.2G23.0A23.3A
TN Exp TN18-5025Conv.S2002055.2E-I145B-E39.3H-K21.5JK
TN Exp TN16-5024Conv.S2002154.4E-I146A-D39.5G-J21.1LM
TN Exp TN17-5021Conv.S2001854.4E-I146A-C38.6KL22.1E-G
MO S16-3747RYRRS1902854.3E-I54.5DE146A141A38.8KL38.0F21.9G-I22.3DE
Credenz CZ 5000 XR2XS2003254.0E-I142H39.5G-J22.8AB
AR R13-14635RRRRS2000653.8F-I145A-D39.9F-H21.8G-J
Progeny P5211E3E3S2007653.3G-I145B-F40.0E-G22.3DE
TN Exp TN18-4130Conv.S2001952.4HI146A-C42.1A21.6IJ
TN Exp TN16-5027Conv.S2002252.1I146AB38.8J-L21.6IJ
Average57.357.058.314514014039.739.139.822.022.422.3
Standard Error3.74.33.92640.30.40.50.10.40.2
L.S.D..054.83.02.91110.70.70.50.30.30.2
C.V.151214111111111
Plots per entry (reps x locs.)214263183654369369

† Hybrids that have any MS letter in common are not significantly different at the 5% level of probability.

* Hybrids marked with an asterisk were in the top performing “A” group for two (**) or three (***) years within the previous three year evaluation period.

‡ For a full description of abbreviated biotech traits, see table 31.

§ All yields are adjusted to 13% moisture.

‖ Lodging was evaluated on a a scale of 1 (no lodging) to 5 (complete lodging). C.V. is not reported for lodging since it was not measured using a ratio scale.

¶ Protein and oil on a dry weight basis.

 

Virginia Sykes
Scroll to Top