Table 7. Mean yields and agronomic traits of four corn hybrids evaluated for silage across four REC locations in Tennessee across two years (2016-2017).
| MS Avg. Yield | Hybrid † | Trait Package ‡ | Dry Weight Avg. Yield (tons/acre) | ± | Std Err. | Avg. Yield 65% Moisture (tons/acre) | ± | Std Err. | Moisture at harvest (%) | Plant Height (inches) | Ear Height (inches) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | Croplan 5900 | RR, VT2P | 8.92 | ± | 0.58 | 25.49 | ± | 1.66 | 66 | 115 | 49 |
| A | Augusta 7768 | GT, LL, VIP3110 | 8.57 | ± | 0.58 | 24.49 | ± | 1.67 | 65 | 116 | 43 |
| A | Terral REV 25BHR26 | RR2, LL, YGCB, HX1 | 8.5 | ± | 0.58 | 24.3 | ± | 1.67 | 65 | 114 | 46 |
| A | Terral REV 23BHR55 | RR2, LL, YGCB, HX1 | 8.15 | ± | 0.58 | 23.29 | ± | 1.66 | 67 | 114 | 43 |
| Average | 8.54 | ± | 0.58 | 24.39 | ± | 1.67 | 66 | 115 | 45 |
† Hybrids that have any MS letter in common are not significantly different at the 5% level of probability.
‡ For a full description of abbreviated biotech traits, see table 13.
[fusion_button link=”https://search.utcrops.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/CSTable7.xlsx” title=”” target=”_self” link_attributes=”” alignment=”” modal=”” hide_on_mobile=”small-visibility,medium-visibility,large-visibility” class=”” id=”” color=”default” button_gradient_top_color=”” button_gradient_bottom_color=”” button_gradient_top_color_hover=”” button_gradient_bottom_color_hover=”” accent_color=”” accent_hover_color=”” type=”” bevel_color=”” border_width=”” size=”” stretch=”default” shape=”” icon=”” icon_position=”left” icon_divider=”no” animation_type=”” animation_direction=”left” animation_speed=”0.3″ animation_offset=””]Download Excel File[/fusion_button]
Virginia Sykes vsykes@utk.edu
- Table 1. 2021 Total entry numbers - December 26, 2021
- Table A-35. Mean yields and agronomic data from Memphis, TN, MG-5 - December 23, 2021
- Table A-34. Mean yields and agronomic data from Jackson, TN, MG-5 - December 22, 2021