Quality Data for Hybrids Tested Current Year

Table 6. Mean separation of dry weight yields, milk/ton, and milk/acre of 11 corn hybrids evaluated for silage at four REC locations in Tennessee during 2017.

Hybrid †Trait Package ‡Dry Weight Avg. Yield
(tons/acre)
±Std Err.MS 
Avg. Yield
Milk/ton¤
(lbs/ton)
±Std Err.MS 
Avg. Yield
Milk/acre¤
(lbs/acre)
±Std Err.MS 
Avg. Yield
Croplan 5900RR, VT2P9.01±0.47A3026±70B27307±0A
NK N83D-3111RR, LL, VIP31118.93±0.47AB3161±70AB28469±0A
Terral REV 28BHR18RR2, LL, YGCB, HX18.73±0.47AB3167±70AB27962±0A
Augusta 7768GT, LL, VIP31108.71±0.48ABC3128±70AB27575±0A
Masters Choice MCT6653RR, LL, 3000GT8.55±0.47ABCD3094±70B26574±0A
Croplan 5678RR, VT2P8.34±0.47ABCD3063±70B25646±0A
Terral REV 25BHR26RR2, LL, YGCB, HX18.31±0.47BCD3278±70A27541±0A
Masters Choice MCT6733RR, LL, 3000GT8.28±0.47BCD3127±70AB25953±0A
NK NK1573-3111ARR, LL, VIP31118.02±0.47CDE3183±70AB25694±0A
Terral REV 23BHR55RR2, LL, YGCB, HX17.96±0.47DE3261±70A26156±0A
Masters Choice MCT6363RR, LL, 3000GT7.34±0.48E3284±70A24010±0A
Average8.38±0.473161±7026626±0

 

‡ For a full description of abbreviated biotech traits, see table 13.

† Hybrids that have any MS letter in common are not significantly different at the 5% level of probability.

  • based on University of Wisconsin Milk2006 software program.

 

[fusion_button link=”https://search.utcrops.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/CSTable6.xlsx” title=”” target=”_self” link_attributes=”” alignment=”” modal=”” hide_on_mobile=”small-visibility,medium-visibility,large-visibility” class=”” id=”” color=”default” button_gradient_top_color=”” button_gradient_bottom_color=”” button_gradient_top_color_hover=”” button_gradient_bottom_color_hover=”” accent_color=”” accent_hover_color=”” type=”” bevel_color=”” border_width=”” size=”” stretch=”default” shape=”” icon=”” icon_position=”left” icon_divider=”no” animation_type=”” animation_direction=”left” animation_speed=”0.3″ animation_offset=””]Download Excel File[/fusion_button]

Scroll to Top