Table A-29-a. Mean† yield, agronomic traits, and quality of 18 Maturity Group V Early (5.0 – 5.4) soybean varieties evaluated in small plot replicated trials with irrigation at the Highland Rim AgResearch and Education Center in Springfield, Tennessee during 2021. Analysis included variety performance over a 1 yr (2021), 2 yr (2020-2021), and 3 yr (2019-2021) period.
| Variety | Herbicide Pkg† | Avg. Yield§ (bu/ac) | Moisture at Harvest (%) | Plant Height (in.) | Lodging‖ (1-5) | Maturity (DAP) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 yr | 2 yr | 3 yr | 1 yr | 2 yr | 3 yr | 1 yr | 2 yr | 3 yr | 1 yr | 2 yr | 3 yr | 1 yr | 2 yr | 3 yr | |||||||||||||||||
| AgriGold G5000RX | R2X, STS | 69 | AB | 13.5 | A | 37 | CD | 1.0 | 144 | B-E | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Progeny P5016RXS* | R2X, STS | 69 | A | 68 | A | 63 | A | 13.5 | A | 13.7 | A | 12.9 | A | 41 | B-D | 40 | B | 38 | A | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 143 | D-F | 147 | A | 143 | A | |||
| AR R13-13997 | Conv. | 69 | A | 13.5 | A | 39 | B-D | 1.0 | 147 | AB | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Asgrow AG54XF0 | XF, STS | 67 | AB | 13.1 | A | 39 | B-D | 1.0 | 147 | A | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Dyna-Gro S52XT91 | R2X | 62 | A-C | 13.4 | A | 36 | C-E | 1.0 | 143 | D-F | |||||||||||||||||||||
| AR R15-1587 | Conv. | 60 | A-C | 13.4 | A | 36 | C-E | 1.0 | 144 | A-D | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Asgrow AG52XF0 | XF, STS | 57 | A-D | 13.0 | A | 42 | BC | 1.0 | 146 | A-D | |||||||||||||||||||||
| AgriGold G5288RX | R2X, STS | 55 | A-E | 14.4 | A | 41 | B-D | 1.0 | 144 | A-D | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Local Seed Co. LS5119XF | XF | 55 | A-E | 13.2 | A | 39 | B-D | 1.0 | 141 | E-G | |||||||||||||||||||||
| MO S16-9478C | Conv. | 53 | B-E | 13.1 | A | 38 | B-D | 1.0 | 146 | A-C | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Progeny P5003XF | XF | 53 | B-E | 13.8 | A | 38 | B-D | 1.0 | 140 | FG | |||||||||||||||||||||
| USG 7562XF | XF | 52 | B-E | 13.1 | A | 30 | E | 1.0 | 144 | B-E | |||||||||||||||||||||
| AR UA54i19GT | RR | 52 | B-E | 55 | B | 13.3 | A | 13.4 | A | 44 | AB | 43 | A | 1.0 | 1.0 | 143 | C-F | 146 | A | ||||||||||||
| MO S16-14801C | Conv. | 51 | C-E | 13.7 | A | 35 | DE | 1.0 | 145 | A-D | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Local Seed Co. LS5009XS* | R2X, STS | 51 | C-E | 58 | AB | 13.3 | A | 13.7 | A | 40 | B-D | 40 | B | 1.0 | 1.0 | 143 | C-F | 147 | A | ||||||||||||
| Credenz CZ 5282XF | XF | 42 | DE | 13.8 | A | 48 | A | 1.0 | 146 | A-D | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Progeny P5121E3 | E3 | 41 | E | 13.2 | A | 35 | DE | 1.0 | 139 | G | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Progeny P5252RX | R2X | 41 | E | 47 | B | 47 | B | 13.6 | A | 13.6 | A | 13.0 | A | 40 | B-D | 38 | B | 36 | B | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 141 | E-G | 145 | A | 142 | A | |||
| Average | 55 | 57 | 55 | 13.4 | 13.6 | 13.0 | 39 | 40 | 37 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 144 | 146 | 143 | ||||||||||||||||
| Standard Error | 7 | 5 | 4 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | – | . | – | 1 | 4 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||
| L.S.D..05 | 15 | 12 | 9 | N.S. | N.S. | N.S. | 6 | 3 | 1 | – | . | – | 3 | N.S. | N.S. | ||||||||||||||||
| C.V. | 17 | 18 | 15 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 10 | 6 | 3 | – | . | – | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||
† Varieties that have any MS letter in common are not significantly different at the 5% level of probability. Values highlighted in light orange are above average for a given trait, MS letters highlighted in dark orange are in the “A group”, indicating no statistical difference from the top-performing variety, for a given trait.
* Asterisks after a name indicate the number of preceding consecutive years in the top-performing “A” group.
‡ For a full description of abbreviated biotech traits, see table 31.
§ All yields are adjusted to 13% moisture.
‖ Lodging was evaluated on a a scale of 1 (no lodging) to 5 (complete lodging).
¶ Protein and oil were measured post-harvest using NIRS and are reported on a dry weight basis.
Table A-29-b. Mean yield, agronomic traits, and quality of 18 Maturity Group V Early (5.0 – 5.4) soybean varieties evaluated in small plot replicated trials with irrigation at the Highland Rim AgResearch and Education Center in Springfield, Tennessee during 2021. Analysis included variety performance over a 1 yr (2021), 2 yr (2020-2021), and 3 yr (2019-2021) period.
Variety Herbicide Pkg† Avg. Yield§
(bu/ac)SDS DI††
(%)SDS DS††
(1-9)SDS†† DX
(DI x DS/9)Frogeye‡‡
(%)
1 yr 2 yr 3 yr 1 yr 1 yr 1 yr 1 yr
AgriGold G5000RX R2X, STS 69 AB 1.7 A 1.2 A 0.6 A 2.7 CD
Progeny P5016RXS* R2X, STS 69 A 68 A 63 A 6.7 A 3.3 A 3.3 A 1 D
AR R13-13997 Conv. 69 A 13.3 A 2.8 A 8.8 A 1.3 D
Asgrow AG54XF0 XF, STS 67 AB 0 A 0 A 0 A 4.7 AB
Dyna-Gro S52XT91 R2X 62 A-C 3.3 A 1.7 A 0.9 A 1.7 D
AR R15-1587 Conv. 60 A-C 15 A 2.7 A 6.7 A 1 D
Asgrow AG52XF0 XF, STS 57 A-D 3.3 A 1.5 A 1.7 A 5.7 A
AgriGold G5288RX R2X, STS 55 A-E 21.7 A 6 A 14.8 A 1.7 D
Local Seed Co. LS5119XF XF 55 A-E 35 A 4.8 A 28 A 1 D
MO S16-9478C Conv. 53 B-E 5 A 3.7 A 3.5 A 1 D
Progeny P5003XF XF 53 B-E 33.3 A 3.7 A 28.7 A 2.7 CD
USG 7562XF XF 52 B-E 30 A 4.3 A 26.1 A 3.7 BC
AR UA54i19GT RR 52 B-E 55 B 11.7 A 5 A 7.7 A 1.3 D
MO S16-14801C Conv. 51 C-E 6.7 A 3.2 A 3.5 A 1 D
Local Seed Co. LS5009XS* R2X, STS 51 C-E 58 AB 36.7 A 4.7 A 29.8 A 5 AB
Credenz CZ 5282XF XF 42 DE 15 A 4 A 10 A 1.3 D
Progeny P5121E3 E3 41 E 53.3 A 5.7 A 43.3 A 1.7 D
Progeny P5252RX R2X 41 E 47 B 47 B 61.7 A 6.5 A 54 A 1 D
Average 55 57 55 19.6 3.6 15.1 2.2
Standard Error 7 5 4 16.7 1.7 15.5 0.6
L.S.D..05 15 12 9 N.S. N.S. N.S. 1.7
C.V. 17 18 15 – – – –
† Varieties that have any MS letter in common are not significantly different at the 5% level of probability. Values highlighted in light orange are above average for a given trait, MS letters highlighted in dark orange are in the “A group”, indicating no statistical difference from the top-performing variety, for a given trait.
* Asterisks after a name indicate the number of preceding consecutive years in the top-performing “A” group.
‡ For a full description of abbreviated biotech traits, see table 31.
§ All yields are adjusted to 13% moisture.
†† SDS was evaluated as disease incidence (percentage), disease severity (1 to 9, with 1 indicating no disease), and disease index (DI x DS/9). Evaluated in mid-September.
‡‡ Frogeye was evaluated using a 1 to 9 scale, with 1 indicating no disease. Evaluated in mid-September.
§§ Seed quality was evaluated visually post-harvest using a 1 to 5 scale, with 1 indicating no shriveled or damaged seed.
¶¶ Purple stain was evaluated visually post-harvest using a 1 to 5 scale, with 1 indicating no purple stain.
Virginia Sykes vsykes@utk.edu
- Table 1. 2021 Total entry numbers - December 26, 2021
- Table A-35. Mean yields and agronomic data from Memphis, TN, MG-5 - December 23, 2021
- Table A-34. Mean yields and agronomic data from Jackson, TN, MG-5 - December 22, 2021