Table A-17. Mean yields and agronomic data from Milan, TN Irrigated, MG-3

Table A-17. Mean yield, agronomic traits, and quality of 9 Maturity Group III (3.0 – 3.9) soybean varieties evaluated in small plot replicated trials with irrigation at the AgResearch and Education Center at Milan in Milan, Tennessee during 2020. Analysis included variety performance over a 1 yr (2020), 2 yr (2019-2020), and 3 yr (2018-2020) period.
VarietyHerbicide Pkg† Avg. Yield§
(bu/ac)
     Moisture at Harvest
(%)
     Plant Height
(in.)
     Lodging?
(1-5)
     Maturity
(DAP)
     
1 yr2 yr3 yr1 yr2 yr3 yr1 yr2 yr3 yr1 yr2 yr3 yr1 yr2 yr3 yr
VarietyHerbicide Pkg†Avg. Yield§
(bu/ac)
1 yr
MS
Avg. Yield§
1 yr
Avg. Yield§
(bu/ac)
2 yr
MS
Avg. Yield§
2 yr
Avg. Yield§
(bu/ac)
3 yr
MS
Avg. Yield§
3 yr
Moisture
(%)
1 yr
MS
Moisture
1 yr
Moisture
(%)
2 yr
MS
Moisture
2 yr
Moisture
(%)
3 yr
MS
Moisture
3 yr
Plant Height
(in.)
1 yr
MS
Plant Height
1 yr
Plant Height
(in.)
2 yr
MS
Plant Height
2 yr
Plant Height
(in.)
3 yr
MS
Plant Height
3 yr
Lodging¶
(%)
1 yr
MS
Lodging¶
1 yr
Lodging¶
(%)
2 yr
MS
Lodging¶
2 yr
Lodging¶
(%)
3 yr
MS
Lodging¶
3 yr
Maturity
(DAP)
1 yr
MS
Maturity
1 yr
Maturity
(DAP)
2 yr
MS
Maturity
2 yr
Maturity
(DAP)
3 yr
MS
Maturity
3 yr
Asgrow AG39X7R2XS1701854.5A63.0A61.5A13.4A12.1A12.1A44B46B47A3.0A2.3A2.1A114C116A115A
AgriGold G3722RXR2XS1901054.4A60.6A14.9A13.2A49A50A2.7A2.2A118BC118A
Asgrow AG38X8R2XS1701754.4A13.8A45B2.3A117BC
Credenz CZ 3930 GTLLRR, LLS2002353.6A15.2A44B2.3A129A
AgriGold G3620RXR2XS2008153.3A13.8A44B3.7A114C
Asgrow AG36X6R2XS1701552.3A60.0A61.0A14.0A13.0A12.6A44B44B44B3.3A2.8A2.6A116C117A116A
Dyna-Gro S39EN19**E3S1907052.0A63.1A14.2A13.3A44B46B2.3A2.2A123AB118A
Local Seed Co. LS3906GLGT, LLS2004550.3A14.5A45B3.3A119BC
Local Seed Co. LS3976X**R2XS1905048.5A60.1A13.7A13.0A44B44B3.7A2.7A117BC118A
Average52.661.361.214.212.912.44546453.02.42.3119117116
Standard Error2.89.24.80.51.20.81110.40.60.5311
L.S.D..05N.S.N.S.N.S.N.S.N.S.N.S.323N.S.N.S.N.S.7N.S.N.S.
C.V.98851110345321
† Hybrids that have any MS letter in common are not significantly different at the 5% level of probability. * Hybrids marked with an asterisk were in the top performing “A” group for two (**) or three (***) years within the previous three year evaluation period. ‡ For a full description of abbreviated biotech traits, see table 31. § All yields are adjusted to 13% moisture. ‖ Lodging was evaluated on a a scale of 1 (no lodging) to 5 (complete lodging). C.V. is not reported for lodging since it was not measured using a ratio scale. ¶ Protein and oil on a dry weight basis. Values highlighted in light orange are above average for a given trait, MS letters highlighted in dark orange are in the “A group”, indicating no statistical difference from the top-performing variety, for a given trait.  
Virginia Sykes
Scroll to Top