Table A-10. Mean yields and agronomic data from Knoxville, TN, MG-4E

Table A-10-a. Mean† yield and agronomic traits of 29 Maturity Group IV Early (4.0 – 4.4) soybean varieties evaluated in small plot replicated trials with irrigation at the East Tennessee AgResearch and Education Center in Knoxville, Tennessee during 2021. Analysis included variety performance over a 1 yr (2021), 2 yr (2020-2021), and 3 yr (2019-2021) period.

VarietyHerbicide Pkg†Avg. Yield§
(bu/ac)
Moisture at Harvest
(%)
Plant Height
(in.)
Lodging‖
(1-5)
Maturity
(DAP)
1 yr2 yr3 yr1 yr2 yr3 yr1 yr2 yr3 yr1 yr2 yr3 yr1 yr2 yr3 yr
Armor A45-D20R2X90A15.5A34B-F1.8B-E141A
Dyna-Gro S43XS70R2X, STS86AB83AB79A14.7A15.0CD15.0A36B-D36A36A1.5DE1.5A1.4A137D-F141A139B
Dyna-Gro S41XS98****R2X, STS86A-C86A82A15.0A15.8AB15.5A32D-G34A35A1.7C-E1.6A1.4A136E-G137B136C
Xitavo XO 4371EE384A-D14.8A32D-G1.3E137D-F
Progeny P4521XFSXF, STS84A-D16.3A35B-F1.5DE140AB
Local Seed Co. LS4299XSR2X, STS83A-D82A-C80A15.1A15.7A-C15.6A34B-F36A35A1.7C-E1.6A1.4A139A-D142A141A
Progeny P4501XFSXF, STS83A-D15.5A37BC2.0A-D139B-D
Progeny P4505RXS*R2X, STS82A-E86A15.4A15.9A34B-F36A1.3E1.5A139B-D142A
Innvictis A4371XFXF82A-E15.9A33C-F1.5DE136FG
Dyna-Gro S45ES10*E3, STS82A-E80A-C15.0A14.9D35B-E37A1.5DE1.7A138C-E141A
NK Seed NK43-V8XFXF81A-F15.3A36B-D1.7C-E136E-G
Local Seed Co. LS4517XFSXF, STS81A-F15.2A34B-F1.7C-E139B-D
Dyna-Gro S43EN61E380B-F75C15.1A15.1B-D32E-G31B1.5DE1.5A138C-E142A
Asgrow AG45XF0XF, STS80B-F14.9A33C-F1.7C-E138C-E
Innvictis A4411XFXF79B-F15.5A34B-F2.0A-D138C-F
Innvictis A4571XFXF78C-F15.9A33C-F1.5DE138B-D
Credenz CZ 4562 XFXF77D-F15.0A41A2.5A140A-C
Local Seed Co. LS4415XFXF77D-F15.3A30G1.5DE138C-E
NK Seed NK44-J4XFSXF, STS76D-F16.0A32FG1.3E138B-D
Progeny P4541E3E376D-F15.7A35B-E2.2A-C137D-F
Dyna-Gro S43XF51XF76D-G15.6A34B-F1.3E139B-D
USG 7431ETE376D-G76BC14.9A15.1A-D32FG31B1.3E1.3A137D-F140A
USG 7441XFXF75D-H15.2A35B-E1.8B-E139A-D
Asgrow AG42XF1XF, STS75D-H16.1A37B1.5DE138C-F
Innvictis A4251XFXF74E-H14.6A35B-F2.3AB135G
Dyna-Gro S41EN72E373F-I14.5A33D-G1.5DE137D-F
AgriGold G4100XFXF68G-I15.9A35B-F1.7C-E139A-D
Credenz CZ 4202 XFXF67HI16.0A35B-F2.2A-C140AB
Progeny P4431E3E365I15.3A32FG1.5DE138C-F
Average78818015.415.315.43434351.71.51.4138141138
Standard Error3340.40.40.41110.20.10.1132
L.S.D..0598N.S.N.S.0.7N.S.33N.S.0.5N.S.N.S.232
C.V.786445676121

† Varieties that have any MS letter in common are not significantly different at the 5% level of probability. Values highlighted in light orange are above average for a given trait, MS letters highlighted in dark orange are in the “A group”, indicating no statistical difference from the top-performing variety, for a given trait.

* Asterisks after a name indicate the number of preceding consecutive years in the top-performing “A” group.

‡ For a full description of abbreviated biotech traits, see table 31.

§ All yields are adjusted to 13% moisture.

‖ Lodging was evaluated on a a scale of 1 (no lodging) to 5 (complete lodging).

¶ Protein and oil were measured post-harvest using NIRS and are reported on a dry weight basis.

Table A-10-b. Mean† yield and quality of 29 Maturity Group IV Early (4.0 – 4.4) soybean varieties evaluated in small plot replicated trials with irrigation at the East Tennessee AgResearch and Education Center in Knoxville, Tennessee during 2021. Analysis included variety performance over a 1 yr (2021), 2 yr (2020-2021), and 3 yr (2019-2021) period.

VarietyHerbicide Pkg†Avg. Yield§
(bu/ac)
Protein¶
(%)
Oil¶
(%)
SDS DI††
(%)
SDS DS††
(1-9)
SDS†† DX
(DI x DS/9)
Frogeye‡‡
(%)
Seed Quality§§
(1-5)
Purple Stain¶¶
(1-5)
1 yr2 yr3 yr1 yr2 yr3 yr1 yr2 yr3 yr1 yr1 yr1 yr1 yr1 yr1 yr
Armor A45-D20R2X90A35.3E-G22.9M-P3.3C-E1.3A-D0.7B-E1.7BC1.3EF1.5I
Dyna-Gro S43XS70R2X, STS86AB83AB79A35.7DE37.9A38A22.8N-Q22.6C23A5B-E2A-C1.9A-E1.3BC1.5D-F1.7HI
Dyna-Gro S41XS98****R2X, STS86A-C86A82A35.4EF38A38.2A23.3H-L22.9BC23A1.7DE0.7B-D0.4C-E1.7BC2.8AB3D
Xitavo XO 4371EE384A-D34.8H-J25AB1.7DE1.3A-D0.7B-E1C3A4A
Progeny P4521XFSXF, STS84A-D35.9D23.8EF5B-E1.3A-D1.1B-E1C1.3EF1.5I
Local Seed Co. LS4299XSR2X, STS83A-D82A-C80A35.6DE37.9A38.2A23K-O22.6C22.8A8.3A-C1.7A-D2.4A-C1C1.5D-F1.7HI
Progeny P4501XFSXF, STS83A-D34.4J23.6F-H6.7A-D2.7A2.2A-D1C1F1.5I
Progeny P4505RXS*R2X, STS82A-E86A34.8G-I36.6B23.5G-J23.2B8.3A-C2A-C2.8AB1C1.5D-F1.5I
Innvictis A4371XFXF82A-E35.6DE22.4RS5B-E1.7A-D1.3A-E2B2CD2GH
Dyna-Gro S45ES10*E3, STS82A-E80A-C34.9GH36.7B23.6F-I23.1B5B-E1.7A-D1.5A-E3.7A1.8C-E1.5I
NK Seed NK43-V8XFXF81A-F33.9K24.2DE1.7DE0.7B-D0.4C-E1C2.8AB3.8AB
Local Seed Co. LS4517XFSXF, STS81A-F35.9D22.9L-P6.7A-D2.7A2A-E1.7BC1.7DE1.8HI
Dyna-Gro S43EN61E380B-F75C35F-H36.4B24.8BC24.3A0E0D0E1C3.2A3.7AB
Asgrow AG45XF0XF, STS80B-F33.3L24.4D5B-E1.7A-D1.3A-E1C1.7DE1.5I
Innvictis A4411XFXF79B-F35.5DE23.4H-K10AB2.3AB2.8AB1.3BC1.8C-E2.3FG
Innvictis A4571XFXF78C-F35.4EF22.8N-Q6.7A-D2.3AB1.7A-E1C1.5D-F1.5I
Credenz CZ 4562 XFXF77D-F37A22.6P-S6.7A-D1.7A-D1.3A-E1C1.3EF1.5I
Local Seed Co. LS4415XFXF77D-F35.5DE22.8N-Q11.7A2.7A3.3A1C1.3EF1.5I
NK Seed NK44-J4XFSXF, STS76D-F35.1F-H23.8FG1.7DE0.3CD0.2DE1C2CD2.8DE
Progeny P4541E3E376D-F35.4EF23.3H-K8.3A-C2.7A2.4A-C1C1.5D-F1.5I
Dyna-Gro S43XF51XF76D-G36.8A22.8O-R0E0D0E1C1.7DE2GH
USG 7431ETE376D-G76BC34.5IJ36.6B24.9AB24.2A3.3C-E1.3A-D0.7B-E1C2.8AB3.5BC
USG 7441XFXF75D-H36.4BC23.1J-N1.7DE1A-D0.6C-E1C1.5D-F2GH
Asgrow AG42XF1XF, STS75D-H35.4EF23.2I-M0E0D0E1C1.7DE2GH
Innvictis A4251XFXF74E-H34.9G-I24.5CD3.3C-E1A-D1.1B-E1C2.3BC2.8DE
Dyna-Gro S41EN72E373F-I33.2L25.2A6.7A-D1.3A-D1.5A-E1C3.2A3.2CD
AgriGold G4100XFXF68G-I36.8AB22.4S0E0D0E1.7BC2CD2.5EF
Credenz CZ 4202 XFXF67HI33.9K24.3D6.7A-D1.3A-D1.5A-E1C1F1.5I
Progeny P4431E3E365I36.4C22.5Q-S0E0D0E1C1.7DE2.3FG
Average78.581.280.335.337.238.123.523.3234.51.41.21.21.92.2
Standard Error3.22.73.80.221.40.10.40.32.30.70.70.30.20.2
L.S.D..058.57.8N.S.0.40.7N.S.0.40.4N.S.6.6N.S.2.10.80.60.4
C.V.786121111
.

† Varieties that have any MS letter in common are not significantly different at the 5% level of probability. Values highlighted in light orange are above average for a given trait, MS letters highlighted in dark orange are in the “A group”, indicating no statistical difference from the top-performing variety, for a given trait.

* Asterisks after a name indicate the number of preceding consecutive years in the top-performing “A” group.

‡ For a full description of abbreviated biotech traits, see table 31.

§ All yields are adjusted to 13% moisture.

†† SDS was evaluated as disease incidence (percentage), disease severity (1 to 9, with 1 indicating no disease), and disease index (DI x DS/9). Evaluated in mid-September.

‡‡ Frogeye was evaluated using a 1 to 9 scale, with 1 indicating no disease. Evaluated in mid-September.

§§ Seed quality was evaluated visually post-harvest using a 1 to 5 scale, with 1 indicating no shriveled or damaged seed.

¶¶  Purple stain was evaluated visually post-harvest using a 1 to 5 scale, with 1 indicating no purple stain.

C.V. is not reported for traits measured using a ratio scale 

 

Scroll to Top