Table 39. Two year across locations mean yields and agronomic characteristics of 5 Maturity Group V Late (5.6-5.9) soybean varieties evaluated in five REC tests in Tennessee during 2016-2017.

MS†
Avg.
Yield
Variety*Trait Package‡ Avg. Yield§
(bu/ac)
Avg. Yield Std Err.Moisture
(%)
Lodging‖
(1-5)
Plant Height
(in.)
Maturity¶
(DAP)
Protein††
(%)
Oil††
(%)
Average5761323813941.521.5
AAR UA 5814HPCONV586132.84114243.820.9
AUSG 75B75RRR258612.42.03913941.421.4
AProgeny 5752RYRR257612.41.83913840.721.7
AAR OsageCONV56612.72.03313543.121.0
AAR UA 5715GTRR55612.52.13914138.522.4
 † Varieties that have any MS letter in common are not significantly different in yield at the 5% level of probability.* Varieties marked with an asterisk were in the top performing “A” group for two (**) or three (***) consecutive years within the previous three year evaluation period.‡  For a full description of abbreviated biotech traits, see table 26.All yields are adjusted to 13% moisture.‖  Lodging = 1 to 5 scale; where 1 = 95% of plants erect; 2.5 = ~50% of plants leaning at angle ≥ 45°; 5 = 95+% of plants leaning at an angle ≥ 45°.¶ Maturity = days after planting (DAP).††Protein & Oil on dry weight basis.