Table 3. Across locations mean yields and agronomic characteristics of 17 Maturity Group III soybean varieties evaluated in six REC tests in Tennessee during 2017.

 
MS†
Avg.
Yield
Variety*Trait Package‡ Avg. Yield§
(bu/ac)
Avg. Yield Std Err.Moisture
(%)
Lodging‖
(1-5)
Plant Height
(in.)
Maturity¶
(DAP)
Protein††
(%)
Oil††
(%)
Average57412.12.13712239.622.0
AAsgrow AG39X7 RR2X/SRR2X,STS64412.01.83812239.121.4
ABWarren Seed DS 3838RR261412.32.14012137.723.4
ABCAsgrow AG38X6 RR2XR2X60412.12.44012440.121.8
ABCCredenz CZ 3945 LLLL60412.51.93812540.122.3
ABCDCredenz CZ 3841 LLLL59412.42.43812339.222.3
BCDNK S39-P5XR2X59412.02.33812439.022.2
BCDPfister 39R201RR258412.51.73812240.521.5
BCDAsgrow AG38X8 RR2XR2X57412.11.93612239.621.8
BCDDyna-Gro S39XT08R2X57411.91.93912340.721.6
BCDEAgriGold G3520RXR2X57412.11.93312139.922.1
BCDEAgriGold G3980RXR2X56412.42.73712540.021.2
CDEAsgrow AG37X8 RR2XR2X55411.72.03712240.421.4
CDECredenz CZ 3737 LLLL55412.02.63612040.422.1
DEAsgrow AG36X6 RR2XR2X55412.11.93312139.022.3
DEGoSoy 39C15CONV55412.02.53612339.122.2
ECaverndale Farms CF 387 HT-GLYnRR52412.32.33512138.322.8
EWarren Seed BG 3810 RR2XR2X52411.91.73512240.021.6
† Varieties that have any MS letter in common are not significantly different in yield at the 5% level of probability.* Varieties marked with an asterisk were in the top performing “A” group for two (**) or three (***) consecutive years within the previous three year evaluation period.‡  For a full description of abbreviated biotech traits, see table 26.All yields are adjusted to 13% moisture.‖  Lodging = 1 to 5 scale; where 1 = 95% of plants erect; 2.5 = ~50% of plants leaning at angle ≥ 45°; 5 = 95+% of plants leaning at an angle ≥ 45°.¶ Maturity = days after planting (DAP).††Protein & Oil on dry weight basis. 
Virginia Sykes

Virginia Sykes

Questions about table data?
Virginia Sykes vsykes@utk.edu
Feedback or issues with site information?
Angela McClure athomp15@utk.edu
Virginia Sykes