Table 26. Three year across locations mean yields and agronomic characteristics of 14 Maturity Group IV Late (4.6-4.9) soybean varieties evaluated in four REC tests in Tennessee during 2015-2017.

Variety*Trait Package‡ Avg. Yield§
Avg. Yield Std Err.Moisture
Plant Height
ACredenz CZ 4748 LLLL65512.7241130
ABGoSoy 4714LLLL64512.62.442128
ABCWarren Seed DS 4633RR263513.12.642130
ABCDWarren Seed DS 4850RR2,STS63513.21.546131
ABCDProgeny 4757RYRR262513.32.643132
ABCDTerral REV 47R34RR61512.92.144130
ABCDUSG 74K95RSRR2,STS61512.51.946131
ABCDTerral REV 49R94RR61512.82.343131
BCDGoSoy IreaneCONV60513.21.534135
BCDDyna-Gro S49LL34LL60513.91.843135
BCDUSG EllisCONV59512.81.332135
CDEProgeny 4930LLLL58515.42.042134
DECredenz CZ 4818 LLLL57513.02.347131
ETN Exp TN13-4508R2RR253513.82.243133
  † Varieties that have any MS letter in common are not significantly different in yield at the 5% level of probability. * Varieties marked with an asterisk were in the top performing “A” group for two (**) or three (***) consecutive years within the previous three year evaluation period. ‡  For a full description of abbreviated biotech traits, see table 26. All yields are adjusted to 13% moisture. ‖  Lodging = 1 to 5 scale; where 1 = 95% of plants erect; 2.5 = ~50% of plants leaning at angle ≥ 45°; 5 = 95+% of plants leaning at an angle ≥ 45°. ¶ Maturity = days after planting (DAP). ††Protein & Oil on dry weight basis.  

Virginia Sykes

Questions about table data?
Virginia Sykes
Feedback or issues with site information?
Angela McClure
Virginia Sykes

Latest posts by Virginia Sykes (see all)