Agronomic Data for Hybrids Tested 2 Years

Table 4. Mean dry weight yields across and by location of 11 corn hybrids evaluated for silage at four REC locations in Tennessee during 2017.

MS† Avg. Yield	Hybrid †	Trait Package ‡	Dry Weight Avg. Yield (tons/acre)	±	Std Err.	Knoxville (tons/acre)	Crossville (tons/acre)	Spring Hill (tons/acre)	Springfield (tons/acre)
A	Croplan 5900	RR, VT2P	9.01	±	0.47	8.79	9.39	10.61	7.26
AB	NK N83D-3111	RR, LL, VIP3111	8.93	±	0.47	9.28	8.90	11.13	6.42
AB	Terral REV 28BHR18	RR2, LL, YGCB, HX1	8.73	±	0.47	8.86	9.15	11.01	5.91
ABC	Augusta 7768	GT, LL, VIP3110	8.71	±	0.48	8.48	9.20	10.82	6.49
ABCD	Masters Choice MCT6653	RR, LL, 3000GT	8.55	±	0.47	8.37	8.64	10.07	7.11
ABCD	Croplan 5678	RR, VT2P	8.34	±	0.47	8.20	8.12	10.43	6.61
BCD	Terral REV 25BHR26	RR2, LL, YGCB, HX1	8.31	±	0.47	7.80	8.69	10.71	6.05
BCD	Masters Choice MCT6733	RR, LL, 3000GT	8.28	±	0.47	8.77	8.20	8.99	7.15
CDE	NK NK1573-3111A	RR, LL, VIP3111	8.02	±	0.47	7.69	7.99	9.70	6.69
DE	Terral REV 23BHR55	RR2, LL, YGCB, HX1	7.96	±	0.47	8.24	8.41	9.49	5.71
E	Masters Choice MCT6363	RR, LL, 3000GT	7.34	±	0.48	7.34	7.78	9.00	5.27
	Average		8.38	±	0.47	8.35	8.59	10.18	6.42

 

† Hybrids that have any MS letter in common are not significantly different at the 5% level of probability.

‡ For a full description of abbreviated biotech traits, see table 13.

 

[fusion_button link=”https://search.utcrops.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/CSTable4.xlsx” title=”” target=”_self” link_attributes=”” alignment=”” modal=”” hide_on_mobile=”small-visibility,medium-visibility,large-visibility” class=”” id=”” color=”default” button_gradient_top_color=”” button_gradient_bottom_color=”” button_gradient_top_color_hover=”” button_gradient_bottom_color_hover=”” accent_color=”” accent_hover_color=”” type=”” bevel_color=”” border_width=”” size=”” stretch=”default” shape=”” icon=”” icon_position=”left” icon_divider=”no” animation_type=”” animation_direction=”left” animation_speed=”0.3″ animation_offset=””]Download Excel File[/fusion_button]