Table A-6. Mean† yield and agronomic traits of 7 Maturity Group III (3.0 – 3.9) soybean varieties evaluated in small plot replicated trials with irrigation at the AgResearch and Education Center at Milan in Milan, Tennessee during 2021. All MG-3 varieties evaluated this year were new; therefore, 2 yr and 3 yr analysis are not presented.
| Variety | Herbicide Pkg† | Avg. Yield§ (bu/ac) 1 yr | Moisture at Harvest (%) 1 yr | Plant Height (in.) 1 yr | Lodging‖ (1-5) 1 yr | Maturity (DAP) 1 yr | SDS†† DI (%) 1 yr | SDS†† DS (1-9) 1 yr | SDS†† DX (DI x DS/9) 1 yr | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Armor A39-F73 | XF | 77 | A | 13.7 | A | 42 | A | 1.3 | A | 136 | A | 1.7 | A | 1.0 | A | 0.6 | A |
| USG 7392XFS | XF, STS | 74 | AB | 12.9 | A | 42 | A | 1.0 | A | 137 | A | 1.7 | A | 1.7 | A | 0.9 | A |
| Local Seed Co. LS3908XFS | XF, STS | 67 | A-C | 13.6 | A | 40 | A | 1.0 | A | 138 | A | 4.9 | A | 2.3 | A | 1.3 | A |
| Asgrow AG38XF1 | XF | 65 | B-D | 13.7 | A | 38 | A | 1.0 | A | 133 | B | 1.7 | A | 0.8 | A | 0.5 | A |
| Asgrow AG36XF1 | XF | 61 | CD | 13.3 | A | 37 | A | 1.5 | A | 132 | B | 1.7 | A | 1.0 | A | 0.6 | A |
| Asgrow AG37XF1 | XF | 59 | CD | 13.7 | A | 38 | A | 1.0 | A | 130 | C | 0.0 | A | 0.0 | A | 0.0 | A |
| NK Seed NK39-A1XF | XF | 55 | D | 12.4 | A | 35 | A | 1.0 | A | 130 | C | 0.0 | A | 0.0 | A | 0.0 | A |
| Average | 66 | 13.3 | 39 | 1.1 | 134 | 1.7 | 1.0 | 0.5 | |||||||||
| Standard Error | 5 | 0.9 | 2 | 0.2 | 1 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 0.5 | |||||||||
| L.S.D..05 | 11 | N.S. | N.S. | N.S. | 2 | N.S. | N.S. | N.S. | |||||||||
| C.V. | 10 | 11 | 6 | 27 | 1 | 128 | 168 | 168 |
† Varieties that have any MS letter in common are not significantly different at the 5% level of probability. Values highlighted in light orange are above average for a given trait, MS letters highlighted in dark orange are in the “A group”, indicating no statistical difference from the top-performing variety, for a given trait.
* Asterisks after a name indicate the number of preceding consecutive years in the top-performing “A” group.
‡ For a full description of abbreviated biotech traits, see table 31.
§ All yields are adjusted to 13% moisture.
‖ Lodging was evaluated on a a scale of 1 (no lodging) to 5 (complete lodging).
†† SDS was evaluated as disease incidence (percentage), disease severity (1 to 9, with 1 indicating no disease), and disease index (DI x DS/9). Evaluated in mid-September.
Virginia Sykes vsykes@utk.edu
- Table 1. 2021 Total entry numbers - December 26, 2021
- Table A-35. Mean yields and agronomic data from Memphis, TN, MG-5 - December 23, 2021
- Table A-34. Mean yields and agronomic data from Jackson, TN, MG-5 - December 22, 2021