Table A-6. Mean yields and agronomic data from Milan, TN Irrigated, MG-3

Table A-6. Mean† yield and agronomic traits of 7 Maturity Group III (3.0 – 3.9) soybean varieties evaluated in small plot replicated trials with irrigation at the AgResearch and Education Center at Milan in Milan, Tennessee during 2021. All MG-3 varieties evaluated this year were new; therefore, 2 yr and 3 yr analysis are not presented.

VarietyHerbicide Pkg†Avg. Yield§
1 yr
Moisture at Harvest
1 yr
Plant Height
1 yr
1 yr
1 yr
1 yr
1 yr
(DI x DS/9)
1 yr
Armor A39-F73XF77A13.7A42A1.3A136A1.7A1.0A0.6A
USG 7392XFSXF, STS74AB12.9A42A1.0A137A1.7A1.7A0.9A
Local Seed Co. LS3908XFSXF, STS67A-C13.6A40A1.0A138A4.9A2.3A1.3A
Asgrow AG38XF1XF65B-D13.7A38A1.0A133B1.7A0.8A0.5A
Asgrow AG36XF1XF61CD13.3A37A1.5A132B1.7A1.0A0.6A
Asgrow AG37XF1XF59CD13.7A38A1.0A130C0.0A0.0A0.0A
NK Seed NK39-A1XFXF55D12.4A35A1.0A130C0.0A0.0A0.0A
Standard Error50.920.

† Varieties that have any MS letter in common are not significantly different at the 5% level of probability. Values highlighted in light orange are above average for a given trait, MS letters highlighted in dark orange are in the “A group”, indicating no statistical difference from the top-performing variety, for a given trait.

* Asterisks after a name indicate the number of preceding consecutive years in the top-performing “A” group.

‡ For a full description of abbreviated biotech traits, see table 31.

§ All yields are adjusted to 13% moisture.

‖ Lodging was evaluated on a a scale of 1 (no lodging) to 5 (complete lodging).

†† SDS was evaluated as disease incidence (percentage), disease severity (1 to 9, with 1 indicating no disease), and disease index (DI x DS/9). Evaluated in mid-September. 

Scroll to Top