Table A-14. Mean yields and agronomic data from Milan, TN Irrigated, MG-4E

Table A-14-a. Mean† yield and agronomic traits of 29 Maturity Group IV Early (4.0 – 4.4) soybean varieties evaluated in small plot replicated trials with irrigation at the AgResearch and Education Center at Milan in Milan, Tennessee during 2021. Analysis included variety performance over a 1 yr (2021), 2 yr (2020-2021), and 3 yr (2019-2021) period.

VarietyHerbicide Pkg†Avg. Yield§
(bu/ac)
Moisture at Harvest
(%)
Plant Height
(in.)
Lodging‖
(1-5)
Maturity
(DAP)
1 yr2 yr3 yr1 yr2 yr3 yr1 yr2 yr3 yr1 yr2 yr3 yr1 yr2 yr3 yr
NK Seed NK43-V8XFXF73A13.1A41B-E2.3A-C138E-G
Dyna-Gro S43XS70R2X, STS72A68A68A13.2A13.0A12.3A43AB47A46A1.3CD2.2BC1.9A137F-H131BC129A
Progeny P4505RXS*R2X, STS72A70A12.9A12.9A41A-D46AB2.7AB3.2A138D-G133B
Local Seed Co. LS4415XFXF72AB14.1A37F1.3CD138E-G
Progeny P4501XFSXF, STS72AB14.9A43AB2.3A-C138D-G
USG 7441XFXF69A-C14.0A43AB1.3CD142AB
Dyna-Gro S41EN72E368A-D12.6A39D-F3.0A136G-I
Armor A45-D20R2X67A-D13.8A41B-E1.3CD141BC
Credenz CZ 4562 XFXF67A-D13.8A42A-C1.7B-D140B-D
Dyna-Gro S45ES10*E3, STS66A-D71A13.2A13.1A39C-F44A-D1.3CD1.7C141BC137A
Innvictis A4411XFXF66A-D11.9A39D-F2.0A-C135HI
Progeny P4521XFSXF, STS66A-D13.5A42A-C1.0D144A
Local Seed Co. LS4517XFSXF, STS65A-D12.1A41A-D2.3A-C138D-G
NK Seed NK44-J4XFSXF, STS65A-D12.9A39D-F1.3CD138E-G
Dyna-Gro S41XS98****R2X, STS64A-D66A70A14.0A13.4A12.8A41A-D44A-C45A1.3CD2.5AB2.2A135HI128C126B
Asgrow AG45XF0XF, STS63A-E13.0A37F1.3CD138D-G
Dyna-Gro S43EN61E363A-E65A13.5A12.9A39C-F42D1.0D2.3BC136G-I133B
Innvictis A4371XFXF63A-E12.7A41B-E3.0A135HI
Xitavo XO 4371EE363A-E11.7A39D-F1.7B-D139C-F
Local Seed Co. LS4299XSR2X, STS62A-E65A67A12.8A12.6A11.7A38EF44B-D45A1.3CD2.2BC2.0A136G-I130C128A
Innvictis A4251XFXF61B-E12.2A38D-F2.7AB136G-I
Progeny P4431E3E360C-E11.9A41B-E1.7B-D138D-G
Progeny P4541E3E360C-E13.4A43AB1.7B-D138E-G
Dyna-Gro S43XF51XF60C-E13.0A41A-D1.3CD137F-H
AgriGold G4100XFXF58C-F12.1A43AB2.3A-C137F-H
Innvictis A4571XFXF57D-F13.0A37F2.3A-C140B-E
Asgrow AG42XF1XF, STS52E-G14.1A44A1.3CD134I
USG 7431ETE347FG51B11.9A11.8A39D-F43CD1.3CD2.5AB138D-G133B
Credenz CZ 4202 XFXF45G13.3A44A3.0A137F-H
Average63656813.112.812.34144451.82.42.0138132128
Standard Error4320.90.50.81430.50.90.6154
L.S.D..05117N.S.N.S.N.S.N.S.33N.S.1.20.7N.S.332
C.V.11981199556402421121

† Varieties that have any MS letter in common are not significantly different at the 5% level of probability. Values highlighted in light orange are above average for a given trait, MS letters highlighted in dark orange are in the “A group”, indicating no statistical difference from the top-performing variety, for a given trait.

* Asterisks after a name indicate the number of preceding consecutive years in the top-performing “A” group.

‡ For a full description of abbreviated biotech traits, see table 31.

§ All yields are adjusted to 13% moisture.

‖ Lodging was evaluated on a a scale of 1 (no lodging) to 5 (complete lodging).

†† SDS was evaluated as disease incidence (percentage), disease severity (1 to 9, with 1 indicating no disease), and disease index (DI x DS/9). Evaluated in mid-September.

Table A-14-b. Mean† yield and agronomic traits of 29 Maturity Group IV Early (4.0 – 4.4) soybean varieties evaluated in small plot replicated trials with irrigation at the AgResearch and Education Center at Milan in Milan, Tennessee during 2021. Analysis included variety performance over a 1 yr (2021), 2 yr (2020-2021), and 3 yr (2019-2021) period.

VarietyHerbicide Pkg†Avg. Yield§
(bu/ac)
Maturity
(DAP)
SDS DI††
(%)
SDS DS††
(1-9)
SDS†† DX
(DI x DS/9)
1 yr2 yr3 yr1 yr2 yr3 yr1 yr1 yr1 yr
NK Seed NK43-V8XFXF73A138E-G0D0F0D
Dyna-Gro S43XS70R2X, STS72A68A68A137F-H131BC129A1.7CD1.3D-F0.7CD
Progeny P4505RXS*R2X, STS72A70A138D-G133B0D0F0D
Local Seed Co. LS4415XFXF72AB138E-G5A-D5.3A3A-C
Progeny P4501XFSXF, STS72AB138D-G8.3AB3.7A-C5.2A
USG 7441XFXF69A-C142AB0D0F0D
Dyna-Gro S41EN72E368A-D136G-I3.3B-D1.7C-F0.9CD
Armor A45-D20R2X67A-D141BC3.3B-D0.7EF0.7CD
Credenz CZ 4562 XFXF67A-D140B-D1.7CD1EF0.6D
Dyna-Gro S45ES10*E3, STS66A-D71A141BC137A0D0F0D
Innvictis A4411XFXF66A-D135HI0D0F0D
Progeny P4521XFSXF, STS66A-D144A3.3B-D1.3D-F1.5B-D
Local Seed Co. LS4517XFSXF, STS65A-D138D-G1.7CD1.3D-F0.7CD
NK Seed NK44-J4XFSXF, STS65A-D138E-G0D0F0D
Dyna-Gro S41XS98****R2X, STS64A-D66A70A135HI128C126B0D0F0D
Asgrow AG45XF0XF, STS63A-E138D-G8.3AB4.3AB4.1A
Dyna-Gro S43EN61E363A-E65A136G-I133B0D0F0D
Innvictis A4371XFXF63A-E135HI3.3B-D1EF1.1CD
Xitavo XO 4371EE363A-E139C-F0D0F0D
Local Seed Co. LS4299XSR2X, STS62A-E65A67A136G-I130C128A1.7CD0.5F0.3D
Innvictis A4251XFXF61B-E136G-I5A-D0.7EF1.1CD
Progeny P4431E3E360C-E138D-G0D0F0D
Progeny P4541E3E360C-E138E-G10.2A2.8B-E3.3A-C
Dyna-Gro S43XF51XF60C-E137F-H0D0F0D
AgriGold G4100XFXF58C-F137F-H0D0F0D
Innvictis A4571XFXF57D-F140B-E6.7A-C3.3A-D3.7AB
Asgrow AG42XF1XF, STS52E-G134I0D0F0D
USG 7431ETE347FG51B138D-G133B0D0F0D
Credenz CZ 4202 XFXF45G137F-H0D0F0D
Average6365681381321282.210.9
Standard Error43215420.80.9
L.S.D..05117N.S.3325.42.12.4
C.V.1198121

† Varieties that have any MS letter in common are not significantly different at the 5% level of probability. Values highlighted in light orange are above average for a given trait, MS letters highlighted in dark orange are in the “A group”, indicating no statistical difference from the top-performing variety, for a given trait.

* Asterisks after a name indicate the number of preceding consecutive years in the top-performing “A” group.

‡ For a full description of abbreviated biotech traits, see table 31.

§ All yields are adjusted to 13% moisture.

‖ Lodging was evaluated on a a scale of 1 (no lodging) to 5 (complete lodging).

¶ Protein and oil were measured post-harvest using NIRS and are reported on a dry weight basis.

†† SDS was evaluated as disease incidence (percentage), disease severity (1 to 9, with 1 indicating no disease), and disease index (DI x DS/9). Evaluated in mid-September.

‡‡ Frogeye was evaluated using a 1 to 9 scale, with 1 indicating no disease. Evaluated in mid-September.

§§ Seed quality was evaluated visually post-harvest using a 1 to 5 scale, with 1 indicating no shriveled or damaged seed.

¶¶  Purple stain was evaluated visually post-harvest using a 1 to 5 scale, with 1 indicating no purple stain. 

Scroll to Top