Table 6-a. By location mean biomass, canopy cover, and height of 60 cover crop varieties evaluated in small plot replicated trials at the University of Tennessee Middle Tennessee AgResearch and Education in Spring Hill, TN during 2019-2020.
| Variety | Common Name | Group | Biomass (DM tons/ac) | Canopy Cover (%) | Height (in) | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr† | May | Nov | Feb | Nov | Feb | Apr | May | |||||||||||
| Brassicas | ||||||||||||||||||
| Impact | Collards | Brassica | 0.1 | P-U | 0.2 | VW | 3 | W-Z | 11 | S-W | 1 | N-S | 2 | G-I | 3 | W-Y | 2 | ST |
| Extender | Hyb. Brassica | Brassica | 0 | U | 0.2 | VW | 3 | YZ | 9 | VW | 1 | N-R | 1 | I | 10 | L-P | 13 | L-O |
| Viva | Hyb. Brassica | Brassica | 0 | TU | 0.2 | VW | 6 | M-W | 12 | R-W | 1 | N-S | 1 | I | 13 | H-L | 13 | L-O |
| Vivant | Hyb. Brassica | Brassica | 0 | U | 0.2 | VW | 5 | T-Z | 12 | R-W | 1 | N-S | 1 | I | 6 | Q-X | 5 | Q-T |
| Aerifi | Radish | Brassica | 0.1 | R-U | 0.2 | U-W | 5 | S-Z | 10 | U-W | 1 | O-S | 1 | I | 5 | S-Y | 2 | ST |
| Digger | Radish | Brassica | 0 | TU | 0.2 | VW | 4 | S-Z | 10 | T-W | 1 | N-S | 1 | I | 11 | K-O | 5 | Q-T |
| Driller | Radish | Brassica | 0 | U | 0.1 | W | 12 | I-R | 10 | VW | 1 | O-S | 1 | I | 5 | R-Y | 11 | M-Q |
| SERALPHA | Radish | Brassica | 0 | U | 0.2 | VW | 5 | R-Z | 11 | S-W | 1 | O-S | 1 | I | 8 | N-V | 1 | T |
| SERWF19 | Radish | Brassica | 0.1 | R-U | 0.1 | W | 3 | Z | 8 | W | 1 | N-S | 1 | I | 3 | W-Y | 1 | T |
| Smart | Radish | Brassica | 0.1 | R-U | 0.2 | T-W | 3 | YZ | 11 | S-W | 1 | O-S | 1 | I | 6 | P-X | 4 | R-T |
| Jackpot | Turnip | Brassica | 0.1 | S-U | 0.2 | VW | 4 | W-Z | 10 | U-W | 1 | N-S | 2 | G-I | 17 | D-H | 7 | O-T |
| Average | 0 | 0.2 | 5 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 6 | ||||||||||
| Min | 0 | 0.1 | 3 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | ||||||||||
| Max | 0.1 | 0.2 | 12 | 12 | 1 | 2 | 17 | 13 | ||||||||||
| Range | 0.1 | 0.1 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 12 | ||||||||||
† Varieties that have any MS letter in common are not significantly different (Fisher’s Protected LSD, P<0.05). Mean separation was performed across all entries. Varieties within the “A group” were top performers across all entries and mean separation letters of these entries are highlighted in dark orange.
For ease of viewing, the table is broken into functional groups (brassicas, cereals, legumes). Mean values for top performers within each functional group are highlighted in light orange (50th – 75th percentile) and dark orange (> 75th percentile).
Table 6-b. By location mean biomass, canopy cover, and height of 60 cover crop varieties evaluated in small plot replicated trials at the University of Tennessee Middle Tennessee AgResearch and Education in Spring Hill, TN during 2019-2020.
| Variety | Common Name | Group | Biomass (DM tons/ac) | Canopy Cover (%) | Height (in) | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr† | May | Nov | Feb | Nov | Feb | Apr | May | |||||||||||
| Cereals | ||||||||||||||||||
| Centurion | Annual Ryegrass | Cereal | 0.1 | R-U | 0.7 | P-V | 5 | N-Y | 20 | M-R | 4 | G-K | 2 | G-I | 9 | L-R | 16 | H-M |
| Lowboy | Annual Ryegrass | Cereal | 0 | U | 0.3 | T-W | 4 | V-Z | 13 | P-W | 3 | M | 1 | I | 4 | W-Y | 8 | O-S |
| 140760 | Barley | Cereal | 0.2 | M-U | 0.9 | L-S | 8 | I-R | 14 | P-W | 4 | H-L | 5 | B-E | 10 | K-P | 21 | E-K |
| 140789 | Barley | Cereal | 0.1 | R-U | 0.7 | O-U | 11 | D-L | 21 | M-Q | 4 | H-K | 4 | D-F | 6 | P-X | 15 | J-N |
| 140797 | Barley | Cereal | 0.1 | P-U | 1 | J-R | 13 | C-J | 19 | M-U | 5 | F-J | 4 | D-F | 8 | N-V | 16 | I-M |
| SB255 | Barley | Cereal | 0.2 | L-U | 1.1 | I-Q | 15 | A-D | 21 | M-R | 5 | E-I | 4 | D-F | 10 | L-P | 21 | E-K |
| Secretariat | Barley | Cereal | 0.2 | M-U | 1.3 | G-N | 10 | D-L | 18 | M-V | 4 | K-M | 4 | C-F | 9 | M-S | 18 | F-L |
| Bates RS4 | Cereal Rye | Cereal | 0.6 | A-H | 1.3 | G-M | 21 | A | 20 | M-S | 5 | C-G | 6 | AB | 21 | B-E | 43 | C |
| Elbon (1) | Cereal Rye | Cereal | 0.3 | K-S | 1.2 | H-P | 14 | A-G | 19 | M-S | 5 | F-J | 3 | E-G | 17 | D-G | 48 | BC |
| Elbon (2) | Cereal Rye | Cereal | 0.4 | E-M | 1.4 | F-M | 19 | AB | 26 | J-M | 5 | C-H | 4 | C-F | 18 | B-F | 48 | BC |
| Goku | Cereal Rye | Cereal | 0.4 | F-N | 1.5 | E-J | 18 | A-C | 19 | M-T | 5 | C-F | 5 | B-E | 18 | C-G | 48 | BC |
| NF95319B | Cereal Rye | Cereal | 0.7 | A-D | 1.7 | C-H | 20 | AB | 22 | M-P | 6 | AB | 6 | A | 22 | AB | 48 | BC |
| NF97325 | Cereal Rye | Cereal | 0.5 | B-J | 1.6 | D-I | 14 | A-G | 19 | M-T | 5 | D-I | 5 | A-D | 21 | B-D | 54 | AB |
| NF99362 | Cereal Rye | Cereal | 0.5 | C-K | 1.3 | G-M | 15 | A-D | 20 | M-S | 6 | B-D | 6 | A-D | 22 | A-C | 50 | AB |
| Wintergrazer 70 | Cereal Rye | Cereal | 0.5 | E-K | 1.4 | F-L | 14 | A-F | 19 | M-U | 6 | A-C | 6 | A | 26 | A | 55 | A |
| Yankee | Cereal Rye | Cereal | 0.1 | R-U | 0.8 | M-S | 15 | A-E | 18 | M-V | 5 | C-H | 1 | HI | 9 | M-T | 31 | D |
| Bob | Oat | Cereal | 0.3 | K-S | 1 | J-R | 10 | D-L | 15 | N-W | 5 | D-I | 5 | A-D | 11 | J-N | 24 | EF |
| Cosaque | Oat | Cereal | 0.2 | L-U | 0.9 | K-R | 14 | B-I | 16 | N-W | 5 | F-J | 5 | B-E | 9 | M-T | 16 | I-M |
| Hilliard | Wheat | Cereal | 0.3 | I-Q | 1.2 | G-O | 10 | D-K | 25 | J-M | 5 | F-J | 6 | A-C | 14 | G-K | 22 | E-I |
| Liberty 5658 | Wheat | Cereal | 0.5 | E-L | 1.1 | I-P | 14 | A-H | 22 | M-Q | 5 | C-F | 6 | A-C | 17 | D-H | 24 | E-G |
| Average | 0.3 | 1.1 | 13 | 19 | 5 | 4 | 14 | 31 | ||||||||||
| Min | 0 | 0.3 | 4 | 13 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 8 | ||||||||||
| Max | 0.7 | 1.7 | 21 | 26 | 6 | 6 | 26 | 55 | ||||||||||
| Range | 0.7 | 1.4 | 16 | 13 | 3 | 5 | 22 | 48 | ||||||||||
† Varieties that have any MS letter in common are not significantly different (Fisher’s Protected LSD, P<0.05). Mean separation was performed across all entries. Varieties within the “A group” were top performers across all entries and mean separation letters of these entries are highlighted in dark orange.
For ease of viewing, the table is broken into functional groups (brassicas, cereals, legumes). Mean values for top performers within each functional group are highlighted in light orange (50th – 75th percentile) and dark orange (> 75th percentile).
Table 6-c. By location mean biomass, canopy cover, and height of 60 cover crop varieties evaluated in small plot replicated trials at the University of Tennessee Middle Tennessee AgResearch and Education in Spring Hill, TN during 2019-2020.
| Variety | Common Name | Group | Biomass (DM tons/ac) | Canopy Cover (%) | Height (in) | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr† | May | Nov | Feb | Nov | Feb | Apr | May | |||||||||||
| Legumes | ||||||||||||||||||
| FIXatioN | Clover, Balansa | Legume | 0.2 | M-U | 0.9 | M-S | 9 | J-S | 21 | M-R | 0 | RS | 1 | I | 7 | O-W | 17 | G-L |
| Paradana | Clover, Balansa | Legume | 0.1 | N-U | 0.6 | Q-W | 5 | O-Y | 13 | P-W | 1 | P-S | 1 | I | 5 | Q-Y | 9 | N-R |
| Viper | Clover, Balansa | Legume | 0.1 | O-U | 0.8 | N-T | 6 | M-W | 18 | M-V | 1 | P-S | 1 | I | 5 | S-Y | 12 | L-P |
| Balady | Clover, Berseem | Legume | 0 | U | 0.1 | W | 2 | (-A | 9 | VW | 0 | S | 1 | I | 4 | V-Y | 1 | T |
| Frosty | Clover, Berseem | Legume | 0.3 | J-R | 1.1 | I-P | 4 | T-Z | 22 | M-Q | 1 | O-S | 2 | G-I | 8 | N-U | 18 | F-L |
| AU Sunrise | Clover, Crimson | Legume | 0.5 | E-L | 2 | B-E | 8 | I-R | 36 | F-H | 1 | N-R | 1 | I | 8 | N-U | 22 | E-I |
| Bolsena | Clover, Crimson | Legume | 0.6 | A-G | 2.2 | A-C | 7 | I-R | 36 | F-H | 1 | N-Q | 1 | I | 9 | L-Q | 23 | E-H |
| Dixie | Clover, Crimson | Legume | 0.6 | A-I | 2.1 | A-D | 7 | J-T | 34 | F-K | 1 | N-S | 1 | I | 10 | L-P | 21 | E-J |
| Kentucky Pride | Clover, Crimson | Legume | 0.7 | A-C | 2.5 | AB | 8 | I-Q | 33 | F-L | 1 | N-P | 1 | I | 8 | N-V | 18 | F-L |
| SECCM18 | Clover, Crimson | Legume | 0.5 | B-I | 2 | A-D | 9 | F-M | 39 | E-G | 2 | N | 3 | E-G | 10 | L-P | 20 | E-K |
| White Cloud | Clover, Crimson | Legume | 0.4 | E-M | 1.9 | C-F | 9 | E-M | 34 | F-J | 2 | NO | 1 | I | 10 | L-P | 19 | F-L |
| Big Red | Clover, Red | Legume | 0.1 | Q-U | 0.4 | S-W | 6 | O-Y | 11 | S-W | 1 | N-S | 1 | I | 2 | XY | 6 | P-T |
| Blaze | Clover, Red | Legume | 0 | U | 0.2 | VW | 5 | P-Y | 13 | Q-W | 1 | Q-S | 1 | I | 1 | Y | 6 | Q-T |
| GA9909 | Clover, Red | Legume | 0 | U | 0.3 | T-W | 5 | M-X | 14 | P-W | 1 | O-S | 1 | I | 4 | U-Y | 7 | O-T |
| VNS | Clover, Red | Legume | 0.2 | M-U | 0.5 | R-W | 4 | W-Z | 15 | O-W | 1 | O-S | 1 | I | 5 | T-Y | 9 | N-R |
| VNS | Vetch, Common | Legume | 0.2 | N-U | 0.5 | R-W | 5 | Q-Y | 8 | W | 4 | I-L | 3 | F-H | 10 | L-P | 13 | L-O |
| AU Merit | Vetch, Hairy | Legume | 0.5 | B-J | 2.5 | AB | 8 | H-O | 69 | A | 5 | C-G | 5 | A-D | 15 | F-I | 24 | D-F |
| Patagonia Inta | Vetch, Hairy | Legume | 0.6 | A-E | 2 | A-E | 7 | J-T | 61 | AB | 6 | B-E | 4 | B-E | 15 | F-I | 23 | E-G |
| Purple Bounty | Vetch, Hairy | Legume | 0.6 | A-F | 2.2 | A-C | 4 | X-Z | 49 | CD | 5 | E-I | 3 | E-G | 18 | D-G | 26 | DE |
| Villana | Vetch, Hairy | Legume | 0.6 | A-G | 1.4 | F-K | 4 | U-Z | 35 | F-I | 4 | G-K | 4 | D-F | 15 | F-J | 22 | E-I |
| WinterKing | Vetch, Hairy | Legume | 0.8 | A | 2.1 | A-C | 4 | T-Z | 53 | BC | 6 | B-E | 4 | B-E | 18 | C-G | 24 | E-G |
| Namoi | Vetch, Woolypod | Legume | 0.6 | A-I | 1.2 | G-O | 5 | Q-Y | 26 | I-M | 7 | A | 4 | C-F | 13 | I-M | 21 | E-J |
| Double OO | Winter Pea | Legume | 0.3 | H-P | 1.9 | C-F | 8 | I-R | 24 | K-N | 3 | LM | 2 | G-I | 10 | K-P | 26 | DE |
| Survivor | Winter Pea | Legume | 0.5 | D-K | 2.5 | A | 9 | G-N | 32 | G-L | 4 | H-L | 3 | E-G | 12 | I-N | 23 | E-G |
| VNS (1) | Winter Pea | Legume | 0.8 | AB | 1.8 | C-G | 8 | I-P | 42 | D-F | 4 | I-L | 3 | E-G | 17 | E-H | 26 | DE |
| VNS (2) | Winter Pea | Legume | 0.3 | K-T | 1.6 | D-I | 6 | L-V | 24 | L-O | 4 | K-M | 1 | I | 11 | J-N | 24 | EF |
| Windham | Winter Pea | Legume | 0.5 | D-K | 1.7 | C-H | 8 | I-R | 22 | M-Q | 5 | E-I | 1 | I | 9 | L-Q | 14 | K-N |
| WyoWinter (1) | Winter Pea | Legume | 0.3 | G-O | 1.5 | E-J | 7 | K-U | 27 | H-M | 4 | J-M | 2 | G-I | 11 | I-N | 23 | E-G |
| WyoWinter (2) | Winter Pea | Legume | 0.6 | A-E | 2.5 | AB | 9 | E-M | 46 | C-E | 4 | I-L | 5 | B-E | 15 | F-I | 27 | DE |
| Average | 0.4 | 1.5 | 6 | 30 | 3 | 2 | 10 | 18 | ||||||||||
| Min | 0 | 0.1 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||
| Max | 0.8 | 2.5 | 9 | 69 | 7 | 5 | 18 | 27 | ||||||||||
| Range | 0.8 | 2.4 | 7 | 62 | 6 | 4 | 17 | 26 | ||||||||||
† Varieties that have any MS letter in common are not significantly different (Fisher’s Protected LSD, P<0.05). Mean separation was performed across all entries. Varieties within the “A group” were top performers across all entries and mean separation letters of these entries are highlighted in dark orange.
For ease of viewing, the table is broken into functional groups (brassicas, cereals, legumes). Mean values for top performers within each functional group are highlighted in light orange (50th – 75th percentile) and dark orange (> 75th percentile).
Table 6-d. Summary statistics and ANOVA p-values for by location mean biomass, canopy cover, and height of 60 cover crop varieties evaluated in small plot replicated trials at the University of Tennessee Middle Tennessee AgResearch and Education in Spring Hill, TN during 2019-2020.
| Group | Biomass (DM tons/ac) | Canopy Cover (%) | Height (in) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr† | May | Nov | Feb | Nov | Feb | Apr | May | |
| Brassicas | ||||||||
| Average | 0 | 0.2 | 5 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 6 |
| Min | 0 | 0.1 | 3 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
| Max | 0.1 | 0.2 | 12 | 12 | 1 | 2 | 17 | 13 |
| Range | 0.1 | 0.1 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 12 |
| Cereals | ||||||||
| Average | 0.3 | 1.1 | 13 | 19 | 5 | 4 | 14 | 31 |
| Min | 0 | 0.3 | 4 | 13 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 8 |
| Max | 0.7 | 1.7 | 21 | 26 | 6 | 6 | 26 | 55 |
| Range | 0.7 | 1.4 | 16 | 13 | 3 | 5 | 22 | 48 |
| Legumes | ||||||||
| Average | 0.4 | 1.5 | 6 | 30 | 3 | 2 | 10 | 18 |
| Min | 0 | 0.1 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Max | 0.8 | 2.5 | 9 | 69 | 7 | 5 | 18 | 27 |
| Range | 0.8 | 2.4 | 7 | 62 | 6 | 4 | 17 | 26 |
| Across Groups | ||||||||
| Average | 0.3 | 1.1 | 8 | 23 | 3 | 3 | 11 | 20 |
| Standard Error | 0.1 | 0.3 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Min | 0 | 0.1 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Max | 0.8 | 2.5 | 21 | 69 | 7 | 6 | 26 | 55 |
| Range | 0.8 | 2.4 | 19 | 62 | 6 | 5 | 24 | 54 |
| ANOVA p-values | ||||||||
† Varieties that have any MS letter in common are not significantly different (Fisher’s Protected LSD, P<0.05). Mean separation was performed across all entries. Varieties within the “A group” were top performers across all entries and mean separation letters of these entries are highlighted in dark orange.
For ease of viewing, the table is broken into functional groups (brassicas, cereals, legumes). Mean values for top performers within each functional group are highlighted in light orange (50th – 75th percentile) and dark orange (> 75th percentile).
Virginia Sykes vsykes@utk.edu
- Table 1. 2021 Total entry numbers - December 26, 2021
- Table A-35. Mean yields and agronomic data from Memphis, TN, MG-5 - December 23, 2021
- Table A-34. Mean yields and agronomic data from Jackson, TN, MG-5 - December 22, 2021