Table 27. 2018 MG-5L Yield, Agronomic, and Quality Data across REC Locations (1yr, 2yr, 3yr)

Table 27. Mean yield, agronomic traits, and quality of 9 Maturity Group V Late (5.5 – 5.9) soybean varieties evaluated in small plot replicated trials at six REC locations in Tennessee during 2018. Analysis included variety performance over a 1 yr (2018), 2 yr (2017-2018), and 3 yr (2016-2018) period.

VarietyHerbicide Pkg†Avg. Yield§
(bu/ac)
1 yr
MS
Avg. Yield§
1 yr
Avg. Yield§
(bu/ac)
2 yr
MS
Avg. Yield§
2 yr
Avg. Yield§
(bu/ac)
3 yr
MS
Avg. Yield§
3 yr
Moisture
(%)
1 yr
MS
Moisture
1 yr
Moisture
(%)
2 yr
MS
Moisture
2 yr
Moisture
(%)
3 yr
MS
Moisture
3 yr
Plant Height
(in.)
1 yr
MS
Plant Height
1 yr
Plant Height
(in.)
2 yr
MS
Plant Height
2 yr
Plant Height
(in.)
3 yr
MS
Plant Height
3 yr
Lodging¶
(%)
1 yr
MS
Lodging¶
1 yr
Lodging¶
(%)
2 yr
MS
Lodging¶
2 yr
Lodging¶
(%)
3 yr
MS
Lodging¶
3 yr
Maturity
(DAP)
1 yr
MS
Maturity
1 yr
Maturity
(DAP)
2 yr
MS
Maturity
2 yr
Maturity
(DAP)
3 yr
MS
Maturity
3 yr
Protein¶
(%)
1 yr
MS
Protein¶
1 yr
Protein¶
(%)
2 yr
MS
Protein¶
2 yr
Protein¶
(%)
3 yr
MS
Protein¶
3 yr
Oil¶
(%)
1 yr
MS
Oil¶
1 yr
Oil¶
(%)
2 yr
MS
Oil¶
2 yr
Oil¶
(%)
3 yr
MS
Oil¶
3 yr
USG 75B75R**RR259a61a58a14b-d14a13a38a38a39a1a-b2b2a148b146a142a41b41a41a21e-f21a21b
Progeny 5752RYRR257a-b59a57a15a-b14a13a37a-b38a39a1a-b2b1a148b146a141a41b41a41b21e-f21a22a
USG 7568XTSR2X, STS53b-c59a14c-d14a33c36b2a-b2a147b146a40d40b22c-d21a
VA V12-0045R2RR251c-d15a-c31d2a-b145c40d21f
USG 5618VCONV51c-d15a-d31d1a-b144c42a22b
TN Exp TN16-5004CONV50c-d16a36b2a152a42a21g
Progeny 5688RXR2X48c-e57a14b-d14a33c36b2a2a148b146a40d39b21d-e21a
VA V12-1416RR47d-e14d30d1b-c143c-d39e23a
VA V14-3983CONV45e14c-d25e1c142d41c22b-c
Average5159581514133337391.41.81.514614614240.740.441.221.521.321.5
Standard Error4540112220.30.30.24250.20.20.20.10.10.2
L.S.D..055N.S.N.S.1N.S.N.S.21N.S.0.40.2N.S.2N.S.N.S.0.40.50.50.3N.S.0.2
C.V.14121011888982110.60.91.20.70.80.8
Plots per entry (reps x locs x years.)183654183654183654183654183654369369

† Varieties that have any MS letter in common are not significantly different at the 5% level of probability.

Varieties marked with an asterisk were in the top performing “A” group for two (**) or three (***) years within the previous three year evaluation period.

‡ For a full description of abbreviated biotech traits, see table 31.

  • All yields are adjusted to 15.5% moisture.

‖ Lodging was evaluated on a a scale of 1 (no lodging) to 5 (complete lodging). C.V. is not reported for lodging since it was not measured using a ratio scale.

¶ Protein and oil on a dry weight basis.

Virginia Sykes

Questions about table data?
Virginia Sykes vsykes@utk.edu
Feedback or issues with site information?
Angela McClure athomp15@utk.edu
Virginia Sykes

Latest posts by Virginia Sykes (see all)

Scroll to Top