Yield Data for Hybrids Tested Current Year

Table 3. Mean yields and agronomic traits of 11 corn hybrids evaluated for silage across four REC locations in Tennessee during 2017.

MS 
Avg. Yield
Hybrid †Trait Package ‡Dry Weight Avg. Yield
(tons/acre)
±Std Err. Avg. Yield 65% Moisture
(tons/acre)
±Std Err.Moisture at harvest
(%)
Plant Height
(inches)
Ear Height (inches)Lodging
(%)
ACroplan 5900RR, VT2P9.01±0.4725.75±1.3569119490
ABNK N83D-3111RR, LL, VIP31118.93±0.4725.52±1.3566121460
ABTerral REV 28BHR18RR2, LL, YGCB, HX18.73±0.4724.95±1.3565122470
ABCAugusta 7768GT, LL, VIP31108.71±0.4824.89±1.3767124441
ABCDMasters Choice MCT6653RR, LL, 3000GT8.55±0.4724.42±1.3567127511
ABCDCroplan 5678RR, VT2P8.34±0.4723.83±1.3567111400
BCDTerral REV 25BHR26RR2, LL, YGCB, HX18.31±0.4723.75±1.3568118470
BCDMasters Choice MCT6733RR, LL, 3000GT8.28±0.4723.65±1.3565120400
CDENK NK1573-3111ARR, LL, VIP31118.02±0.4722.91±1.3566116400
DETerral REV 23BHR55RR2, LL, YGCB, HX17.96±0.4722.75±1.3569122430
EMasters Choice MCT6363RR, LL, 3000GT7.34±0.4820.97±1.3769116440
Average8.38±0.4723.94±1.3567120450

 

† Hybrids that have any MS letter in common are not significantly different at the 5% level of probability.

‡ For a full description of abbreviated biotech traits, see table 13.

[fusion_button link=”https://search.utcrops.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/CS-Table3.xlsx” title=”” target=”_self” link_attributes=”” alignment=”” modal=”” hide_on_mobile=”small-visibility,medium-visibility,large-visibility” class=”” id=”” color=”default” button_gradient_top_color=”” button_gradient_bottom_color=”” button_gradient_top_color_hover=”” button_gradient_bottom_color_hover=”” accent_color=”” accent_hover_color=”” type=”” bevel_color=”” border_width=”” size=”” stretch=”default” shape=”” icon=”” icon_position=”left” icon_divider=”no” animation_type=”” animation_direction=”left” animation_speed=”0.3″ animation_offset=””]Download Excel File[/fusion_button]

 

 

Scroll to Top